Main Article Content


This paper describes an implementation of a remote laboratory system for the practical works (PW) of electronics, this system make available to target and analysis the gaps, weaknesses and lack of scientific knowledge of students in the context of electric engineering through data mining algorithms and students’ study behavior. Experimental work has traditionally been developed in laboratories. However, the increase in the number of higher education students in the last decades has put pressure on the physical structures and resources of laboratories. To overcome this, computational simulations and remote laboratories have been developed enabling the expansion of educational boundaries. this paper provides new opportunities to enhance the student’s learning process. The results are presented and discussed according to two levels. The first is development a complete system of remote laboratory E@Slab and compare it with the related work. second level, we present an algorithms of Intelligence Artificial that automate evaluation and classify students in different groups attending to an assessment rubric. After this classification we compare the obtained results from algorithms of Intelligence Artificial with the levels obtained from interviews with the students and from the practical work review for to be a validation of sorts. Finally we compare the two results and we remark that algorithm classifies correctly the students with an accuracy of more than 90%.


Data Mining Algorithms e-Learning Intelligence Articial Remote Laboratorie Embedded System Behavioral Study

Article Details

How to Cite
Ouatik, F., Raoufi, M., Ouatik, F., & Skouri, M. (2021). E-Learning & decision making system for automate students assessment using remote laboratory and machine learning. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(1), 90-100.


  1. Barana, A., Bogino, A., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., Rabellino, S. (2017). Open Platform of self-paced MOOCs for the continual improvement of Academic Guidance and Knowledge Strengthening in Tertiary Education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3).
  2. Baumgartner, P., Payr S. (1997). Erfinden lernen. In: Müller, K.H und Stadler F. (Hg.): Konstruktivismus und Kognitionswissenschaft. Kulturelle Wurzeln und Ergebnisse. In honour of Heinz von Foersters. Wien-New York: Springer, 89–106.
  3. Beetham, H., Falconer, I., McGill, L., Littlejohn, A. (2012). Open practices: Briefing paper. JISC. Retrieved from 6/Open%20Practices%20briefing%20paper.pdf, last accessed August 23rd, 2020.
  4. Cronin, C., MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 10 (2), 127-143.
  5. Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15 (2), 1-10.
  6. Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2014). Degrees of ease: adoption of OER, open textbooks and MOOCs in the Global South. Cape Town, University of Cape Town.
  7. Inamorato dos Santos, A., Punie, Y., Castaño-Muñoz, J. (2016) Opening up Education: A Support Framework for Higher Education Institutions. JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 27938 EN;
  8. Knox, J. (2013). The limitations of access alone: Moving towards open processes in education technology. Open Praxis, 5(1), 21-29.
  9. Koseoglu, S., Bozkurt, A. (2018). An exploratory literature review on open educational practices, Distance Education, 39 (4), 441-461.
  10. Marchisio, M., Operti, L., Rabellino, S., Sacchet, M. (2019). Start@unito: Open Online Courses for Improving Access and for Enhancing Success in Higher Education. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU), Volume 1, 639-646, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
  11. Marchisio, M., Sacchet, M. (2020). Analysis Items to Assess the Quality of Open Online Courses for Higher Education. In: proceedings of the 14th International Conference on e-Learning 2020 (EL 2020), to appear.
  12. Mayer, R. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed., Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Campbell, L., Tabacco, A. (2018). Mapping Open Educational Practices within universities: a case study. Distance Education, 39 (4).
  14. Ouatik. F., Raoufi.M, Bouikhalen.B, Skouri. M, (2017). The EOLES project remote labs across the Mediterranean: an example of a successful experience. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Smart Digital Environment doi>10.1145/3128128.3128152