Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 30, 2020
Accepted
Dec 12, 2020
Published
Dec 30, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2084 Download : 1583

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Community of Inquiry (CoI) is a popular framework to measure meaningful engagement and communication in distance learning environments, where it is claimed that three interactive elements of presence (teaching, social, and cognitive) enhance the quality of education and learning outcomes. Though, several articles have been published in the context of distance education, research suggests lack of empirical evidence on its efficacy in emergency remote teaching. This study investigated the applicability of CoI in remote teaching environment as a predictor of hospitality student’s perception of satisfaction. In doing so, we tested the proposition that course design variables mediate the relationship between CoI elements and student satisfaction. A theoretical model is developed and tested using data collected from 621 hospitality students from an Institute of Eminence in India.  The data were analysed using structural equation modelling and PROCESS macro 3.4 - Model 4.  Overall, the results showed that the proposed model fits the observed relationships accept for cognitive presence. The results implied partial mediation by course design in the relationship between CoI and satisfaction. Among the three presences, the major determinant of satisfaction was teaching presence. We believe that this model could serve as a guide to possible future studies to explore the relevance of CoI framework in remote teaching. The outcomes of this study make significant theoretical and practical contributions to the key stakeholders to design a satisfying online curricula and encourage blended learning. 


 

Keywords

Teaching Presence Social Presence Cognitive Presence Course Design Emergency Remote Teaching Students Satisfaction

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

Author Biographies

Shreelatha Rao, MAHE, WGSHA

Shreelatha Rao is the Coordinator of Department of Management Studies at WGSHA.  Her area of expertise include Statistics, Research Methodology, and Economics. 

Thirugnanasambantham, MAHE, WGSHA

Chef Thiru is the Principal of Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, MAHE, Manipal.  He is an accomplished chef and culinary educator having 25 years of industry and teaching experience. 

Narayan Prabhu

Mr. Narayan Prabhu is the Academic Coordinator at WGSHA.  His area of expertise include mechanical engineering and sales and Marketing. 

How to Cite
Patwardhan, V., Rao, S., Thirugnanasambantham, & Prabhu, N. (2020). Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework and Course Design as Predictors of Satisfaction in Emergency Remote Teaching: Perspectives of Hospitality Management Students. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(4), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135315

References

  1. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D.R. (2011), Learning and Satisfaction in Online Communities of Inquiry, Student Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in E-Learning: An Introduction to Empirical Research, USA, IGI Global, http//doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-615-2.ch002
  2. Alhelalat, J. A. (2015), Hospitality and non-hospitality graduate skills between education and industry, Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 46-55.
  3. Alqurashi, E. (2019), Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments, Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148, https//doi.org/ 10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
  4. Amemado D., Manca S. (2017), Learning from decades of online distance education: MOOCs and the Community of Inquiry framework, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(2), 21-32.
  5. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988), Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3).
  6. Annamalai, N. (2017), An investigation into the Community of Inquiry model in the Malaysian ESL learners’ context, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(3), 246-263, https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-07-2016-0021
  7. Arbaugh, J. B. (2008), Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses?, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9, 1–21.
  8. Bage, L. (2018), Satisfaction with online learning options in the insurance industry: Does mindfulness play a role [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], USA, University of Pennsylvania
  9. Bao, W. (2020), COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behaviour & Emerging Technology, 2, 113–115. URL: wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/hbe2 © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC 113
  10. Biggs, J.B. (2005), Aligning teaching for constructing learning, URL: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/embedded_object.asp?id=21686&filename=Biggs (accessed on 15th July 2020)
  11. Bowen, J. A. (2012), Teaching naked: How moving technology out of your college classroom will improve student learning, Jossey-Bass.
  12. Bryan, A., & Volchenkova, K.N. (2016), Blended learning: Definition, models, implications for higher education. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303815166_BLENDED_LEARNING_DEFINITION_MODELS_IMPLICATIONS_FOR_HIGHER_EDUCATION (accessed 26th November 2020)
  13. Callaway, S.K. (2012). Implications of online learning: Measuring student satisfaction and learning for online and traditional students, Insights to a Changing World. URL: www.franklinpublishing.net (accessed on 16th July 2020)
  14. Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020), 20 Years of the Community of Inquiry Framework, Tech Trends, 64, 557–560, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
  15. Choudhary, R. (2020), COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact and strategies for education sector in India. Economic Times. URL: https://government.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/education/covid-19-pandemic-impact-and-strategies-for-education-sector-in-india/75173099 (accessed 27th November 2020)
  16. Cohan, D.J. (2020), What do we need to teach now?, Inside Higher Ed. URL: https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/not-experiment (accessed 18th July 2020)
  17. Cole, M.T., Shelley, D.J., & Swartz, L.B. (2013a). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three-year study. URL: file:///C:/Users/Administrator/Desktop/e-learning/online%20instruction%20and%20student%20satisfaction.pdf (accessed on 15th July, 2020)
  18. Cole, M.T., Shelley, D.J., & Swartz, L.B. (2013b), Academic integrity and student satisfaction in an online environment, Cases on online learning communities and beyond: Investigations and applications. Hershey, PA.: IGI Global.
  19. Davidson, C. N., & Goldberg, D. T. (2009), The future of learning institutions in a digital age, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  20. Eachempati, P. & Ramnarayan, K. (2020), Covido‐pedago‐phobia, Medical Education, 678-680, https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14257
  21. Ellis, R.A., Ginns, P., & Piggott, L. (2009), E‐learning in higher education: some key aspects and their relationship to approaches to study, Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 303-318. https//doi.org/10.1080/0729436090283999
  22. Friesen, N. (2012). Report: Defining Blended Learning. URL: https://www.normfriesen.info/papers/Defining_Blended_Learning_NF.pdf (accessed 30th November 2020)
  23. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000), Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model, The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  24. Golden, C. (2020), Remote teaching: The glass half-full. EDUCAUSE Review. URL: https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2020/3/remote-teaching-the-glass-half-full (accessed 10th July 2020)
  25. Goodman, R. J., Jr., & Sprague, L.G. (1991), The Future of Hospitality Education: Meeting the Industry's, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 32(2), 66-69.
  26. Govindarajan, V., & Srivastava, A. (2020), What the shift to virtual learning could mean for the future of higher ed. Harvard Business Review, URL: https://hbr.org/2020/03/what-the-shift-to-virtual-learning-could-mean-for-the-future-of-higher-ed (accessed 15th July, 2020)
  27. Graham C.R. (2006), Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Fran-cisco: Pfeiffer Publ.
  28. Gross, M.J. & Manoharan, A. (2016), The balance of liberal and vocational values in hospitality higher education: Voices of graduates, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 28(1), 44-57.
  29. Gursoy, D., Rahman, I. and Swanger, N. A. (2012), Industry’s expectations from hospitality schools: What has changed?, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 24 (4), 32-42.
  30. Gursoy, D., & Swanger, N. (2005), An industry driven model of hospitality curriculum for programs housed in accredited colleges of business: Part II, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 17(2), 46-56, htto//doi.org/ 10.1080/10963758.2005.10696824
  31. Gutiérrez-Santiuste E., Gallego-Arrufat, M.J., & Simone A. (2016), Barriers in computer-mediated communication: typology and evolution over time, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12 (1), 107-119.
  32. Hair, J. F., William, C.B., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, In Pearson New International Edition (7th ed.), London, Pearson Prentice Hall.
  33. Harrell, K. B., & Wendt, J. L. (2019), The impact of blended learning on community of inquiry and perceived learning among high school learners enrolled in a public charter school, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 259–272, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15391523.2019.1590167.
  34. Harsasi, M., & Sutawijaya, A. (2018), Determinants in student satisfaction in online tutorial: A study of a distance education institution, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 89-99.
  35. Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M.K. (2019), Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses, The Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 11-24.
  36. Hodges, S.M., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (March 27, 2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online. URL: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and onlinelearning#:~:text=In%20contrast%20to%20experiences%20that,mode%20due%20to%20crisis%20circumstances (accessed on 16th July 2020)
  37. Hosler, K. A., & Arend, B. D. (2012), The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: Student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence, Educational Media International, 49(3), 217–229.
  38. Jan, S., Vlachopoulos, P., & Parsell, M. (2019), Social network analysis and online learning in communities in higher education: A systematic literature review, Online Learning, 23(1), 249–265, https://doi. org/10.24059/oljv23i1.1398.
  39. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011), Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model, Computers & Education, 57(2), 1654-1664, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
  40. Joksimović, S. Kovanović, ., Skrypnyk, O., Gašević, D. Dawson, S. & Siemens, G. (2015), The history and state of online learning. URL: file:///C:/Users/Administrator/Downloads/Joksimovietal.-2015-Thehistoryandstateofonlinelearning.pdf (accessed 30th November 2020)
  41. Kang, M., Liew, B.T., Kim, J., & Park, Y. (2014), Learning Presence as a Predictor of Achievement and Satisfaction in Online Learning Environments, International Journal on E-Learning, 13(2), 193-208.
  42. Khalid, M.N. & Quick, D. (2016), Teaching presence influencing online students’ course satisfaction at an institution of higher education, International Education Studies, 9(3), 62– 70.
  43. Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014), Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence, The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68–73, http//do/ 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007
  44. Kozan, K., & Caskurlu, S. (2018), On the Nth presence for the Community of Inquiry framework, Computers and Education, 122, 104–118.
  45. Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J.C. (2019), A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), 196-216, https//doi.org/ 10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455
  46. Ladki, S. M. (1993), Hospitality education: the identity struggle, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 12(3), 243-251, https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4319(93)90024-4
  47. Lam, J. Y. C., (2015), Examining student experience of blended learning from the perspective of the Community of Inquiry Framework, Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 10(2), 81–99.
  48. Lashley, C. (2000), In search of hospitality: Towards a theoretical framework, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 19(1), 3-15, http//doi.org/ 10.1016/S0278-4319(99)00035-3
  49. Lee, P. C., Sun, S., Law, R., & Lee, A. H., (2016), Educational technology in hospitality management programs: Adoption and expectations, Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 16(2), 116-142. http//Doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2015.1121795
  50. Maddrell, J.A., Morrison, G.R., & Watson, G.S. (2017), Presence and learning in a community of inquiry, Distance Education, 38(2), 245-258, https//doi.org/ 10.1080/01587919.2017.1322062
  51. Micsky, T., & Foels, L. (2019), Community of Inquiry (CoI): A Framework for Social Work Distance Educators, Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 39 (4-5), 293-307, http//doi.org/ 10.1080/08841233.2019.1642976
  52. Murphy, M. P. A. (2020), COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy, Contemporary Security Policy, 1-14, http//doi.org/ 10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749.
  53. OECD (2020), Supporting the continuation of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Annotated resources for online learning. URL: http://www.oecd.org/education/Supporting-the-continuation-of-teaching-and-learning-during-the-COVID-19-pandemic.pdf (accessed 10th July 2020)
  54. Ottenbacher, M., Harrington, R., & Parsa, H. G. (2015), Defining the hospitality discipline: A discussion of pedagogical and research implications, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 39, 373-400.
  55. Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2019), An empirical study on the online learning experience of MOOCs: Indian students’ perspective, International Journal of Educational Management, 3, 586-609, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-01-2019-0025
  56. Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017), Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis, Computers in Human Behaviour, 71, 402–417.
  57. Sisson, L. G., & Adams, A. R. (2013), Essential hospitality management competencies: The importance of soft skills, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 25(3), 131-145, http//doi.org/ 10.1080/10963758.2013.826975
  58. Smadi, O., Parker, S., Gillham, D., & Muller, A. (2109), The applicability of community of inquiry framework to online nursing education: A cross-sectional study, Nurse Education in Practice, 34, 17-24.
  59. So, H. J., & Brush, T. (2008), Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors, Computers & Education 51(1), 318-336
  60. Strong, R., Irby, T.L., Wynn, J. T., & McClure, M.M. (2012), Investigating students' satisfaction with relearning courses: The effect of learning environment and social presence, Journal of Agricultural Education, 53, 98-110.
  61. Sun, S., Lee, P., Lee, A., Law, R. (2016), Perception of attributes and readiness for educational technology: Hospitality management students’ perspectives, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 28(3), 142 154, http//doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2016.1189832
  62. Swan, K. P., Richardson, J.C., Ice, P., Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008), Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry, e-mentor, 2(24), 1-12, URL: www.e-mentor.edu.pl/eng
  63. Tobin, T.J. (2020), Now is not the time to assess online learning, The Chronicle of Higher Education, URL: https://www.chronicle.com/article/Now-Is-Not-the-Time-to-Assess/248343 (accessed 18th Jul 2020)
  64. UNESCO. (2020), COVID-19 educational disruption and response. URL: https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-emergencies/ coronavirus-school-closures (accessed 15th July 2020)
  65. University of the People. (2020), Emergency Remote Teaching Vs. Online Learning: A Comparison. URL: https://www.uopeople.edu/blog/emergency-remote-teaching-vs-online-learning/ (accessed 30th November 2020)
  66. Wadia, L.C. (2020). Graduating from emergency remote teaching to online higher education in India. URL: https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/graduating-emergency-remote-teaching-online-higher-education-india-67279/ (accessed 28th July 2020).
  67. Wei, H.C., & Chou, C.(2020), Online learning performance and satisfaction: do perceptions and readiness matter?, Distance Education, http//doi.org/ 10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768
  68. Zimmerman, J. (2020), Coronavirus and the great online-learning experiment, The Chronicle of Higher Education, URL: https://www.chronicle.com/article/Coronavirusthe-Great/248216 (accessed 18th July 2020)
  69. Zopiatis, A., Theodosiou, P., & Constanti, P. (2014), Quality and satisfaction with culinary education: Evidence from Cyprus, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 26 (2), 87–98, http//doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2014.900383