Main Article Content

Abstract

In the Covid 19 pandemic, teachers and students have to implement the distance education by using online learning. It creates new obstacles for them but also stimulates potential methods for teaching and learning process to meet the digital era. This study investigated the difference effect of implementing online instruction integrated with brain-based teaching (BBT) approach as an experimental group. A quantitative research design with factorial 2 x2 was applied, then two classes involving each 33 students for experimental group and 30 students for a control group of a private college in Indonesia were chosen as the sample. The instruments used were a questionnaire and a test. Two-way ANOVA was applied to analyze the data. The findings showed that (1) There was distinct impact between experimental class and control class in students’ reading achievement, (2) The achievements of the students in the Reading course with high motivation were higher than those with low motivation., (3) There was an interaction between teaching strategies and the level of students’ motivation in EFL reading achievement. These findings also can stimulate teachers to teach brain-based teaching approach with online instruction to students to enhance their motivation in reading. have to integrate BBT with technology support for the meaningful learning Further research and development on different brain-based teaching approaches is suggested. These findings can encourage teachers to teach EFL learners in brain-based approach integrated with online instruction with the purpose of improving their motivation for reading.

Keywords

English Language Teaching Online Instruction Students Motivation EFL Reading Course

Article Details

How to Cite
Rukminingsih, -, Mujiyanto, J., Nurkamto, J., & Hartono, R. (2021). The impact of online instruction integrated with Brain Based Teaching to EFL Students with Different Motivation Level . Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(2), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135339

References

  1. Akyürek, E.(2013). Effects of brain-based learning approach on students’ motivation and attitudes levels in science class. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 3(1), 104-119.
  2. Biffle C. (2013). Whole brain teaching.(serial online). http://www.wholebrainteaching.com.
  3. Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1990) . Understanding a brain based approach to learning and teaching. Retrieved September 14, 2019, from http://poncelet.math.nthu.edu.tw/chuan/note/note/brain-based
  4. Caine, R.N., & Caine, G.(2012) brain/mind learning principles in action. Retrieved from: http://education.jhu.edu
  5. Conboy, B. (2013). Neuroscience Research: How Experience with One or More Languages Affects the Developing Brain. California’s Best Practices for Young Dual Language Learners: Research Overview Papers. California Department of Education (CDE) State Advisory Council on Early Learning and Care. Sacramento, CA 95814.
  6. Duman, B. (2010). The Effects of Brain-Based Learning on the Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles. In Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice (4th ed., Vol. 10). Eğitim Danışmanlığı ve Araştırmaları İletişim Hizmetler Tic. Ltd. Şti
  7. Fraenkel, J. E., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How To Design and Evaluate Research In Education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
  8. Hardiman, M. (2012). The Brain-Targeted Teaching Model for 21st-century schools. (pp. 27-29). Corwin Publishing.
  9. Handayani,S.B., & Corebimas, A.D.(2017). Model brain based learning (BBL) and whole brain based teaching (WBT) in learning. International Journal of Science and Applied Science, 1(2),153-161
  10. Hardiman, M., Delgado, S., Grizzard, C. O., Novak, S., Stella, J., & Gentry, K. (2012). The Brain-Targeted Teaching Model for 21st century schools: Reading companion and studyguide. (89-90). Corwin Press. http://www.braintargetedteaching.org/Media/ReadingCompanionandStudyGuideBTTfor2
  11. Jamdar, M., & Dasila, P. A conceptual research study on impact of traditional v/s brain based learning approach on knowledge, clinical performance, motivation and self-esteem. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(10).
  12. Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching.https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205
  13. Mekarina, M., & Ningsih, Y. P. (2017). The effects of brain based learning approach on motivation and students achievement in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012057
  14. Pourhossein G. A. (2014). A detailed analysis over some important issues towards using
  15. computer technology into the EFL classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 146-153. doi:10.13189/ujer.2014.020206
  16. Qarqez, M., & Rashid, R.A.(2017). Reading comprehension difficulties among EFL learners: The case of first and second year students at Yarmouk University in Jordan. Arab World English Journal, 8(3). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no3.27.
  17. Retone L. R & Maricar, P.(2020). Effects of Technology-Integrated Brain-FriendlyTeaching on Retention and Understanding in Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration. IC4E 2020, January 10–12, 2020, Osaka, Japan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3377571.3377590
  18. Rukminingsih.(2018, October 13-15). Integrating neurodidactics stimulation into blended learning in accommodating students English l. earning In EFL Setting[Paper presentation].13th Annual Asian Conference Education, Tokyo, IAFOR, Japan.
  19. Rukminingsih, Mujiyanto, J., Nurkamto, J. & Hartono, R.(2021).Building Executive Function With Technology Support: Brain Based Teaching Strategies.UK. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/101201/9781003199267-18
  20. Sprenger, M. 2005. How to Teach So Students Remember, 2nd Edition. Alexandria,, Virginia,: ASCD.
  21. Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). Google classroom as a tool for active learning. doi: 10.1063/1.4960909
  22. Sabitzer, B. (2011).Neurodidactics: Brain-based ideas for ICT and Computer Science Education,The International Journal of Learning, 18(2), 167-175.
  23. Srikoon, S., Bunterm, T., Nethanomsak, T., & Ngang, T.,K.(2017). A comparative study of the effects of the neurocognitive-based model and the conventional model on learner attention, working memory and mood. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1).83-110.
  24. Sousa, D. A. (2001). How the brain learns: A classroom teacher’s guide. California, Corwin Press,Inc.
  25. Sani, A., Rochintintawati, D., & Winarno, N.(2019). Enhancing students' motivation through brain-based learning. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2018) IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1157 (2019) 022059 IOP Publishing https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022059
  26. Uzezi, J. G., & Jonah, K. J. (2017). Effectiveness of brain-based learning strategy on students’ academic achievement, attitude, motivation and knowledge retention in electrochemistry. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 21(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2017/34266
  27. Yang, S-C ,Liu -T , & Todd G.(2019). The effect of flipped classroom on high and low achieves’ English vocabulary learning.The Journal of Asia Tefl, 16(4), 1251-1267. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.12.1251