Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 9, 2022
Accepted
Dec 14, 2022
Published
Dec 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 363 Download : 194

Main Article Content

Abstract

The emergence of a pandemic world has tensioned the reinvention of many sectors. In the field of Arts, especially dance, professionals were affected by physical distancing, making shows impossible. As a result, the dancers were stimulated to a process of invention, exploring other sensations and ways of communicating art in a network. This article presents and discusses the co-creation process of a Social Technological Startup, from the ESTEAM perspective and connectively constituted in reticular movements, as an inventive process, from which two inventions emerged: projection mapped performance and dressing wearable technology, both co- created, assembling digital technologies in network, members of a social dance project, teachers and student from different field of knowledge and educational levels. From the cartographic method of intervention-research and based on contemporary theories, the results show that both the mapped projection and the wearables have significant potential to hybridize art and education, contributing to create learning situations that enable a greater understanding of spatiality and the body, as well as inventing new ways of experiencing dance, expanding the sensorial and the digital. The concept of wearables emerged from an inventive ecosystem, which was constituted in the field of education in connection with other areas of knowledge, intending to promote social transformation, through digital citizenship. The relevance of the research stands out, as long as it provided a digital thinking that co-engendered education, a social project, wearable technologies and dance, in the conception of a startup, in an ecosystem arrangement that problematizes the way universities also operate.

Keywords

Digital Citizenship Social Technological Startup Wearable Technologies Art Education

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Schlemmer, E., Cézar de Oliveira, L., & dos Santos, A. W. (2022). Digital citizenship and invention: the ecosystem inhabiting of education for social transformation. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(3), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135694

References

  1. Accoto, C. (2020). O mundo dado: cinco breves lições de filosofia digital. Paulus Editora.
  2. Alvarez, J., & Passos, E. (2015). Cartografar é habitar um território existencial. In L. da E. Virginia Kastrup, Eduardo Passos (Ed.), Pista do método da cartografia: pesquisa-intervenção e produção de subjetividade (pp. 131–149). Sulina.
  3. Autodesk. (2021). Autodesk - Tinkercad.
  4. De Barros, L. P., & Kastrup, V. (2015). Cartografar é acompanhar processos. In Sulina (Ed.), Pistas do Método da Cartografia (pp. 52– 75).
  5. De Kerckhove, D., Di Felice, M., Pireddu, M., Accoto, C., a De Mirand, J. B., & Martinez, E. J.
  6. A. S. (2022). Manifesto per la cittadinanza digitale. PAMPAEDIA-BOLLETTINO As. Pe. I, (192), 078-087.
  7. Di Felice, M. (2012). Redes Sociais Digitais, Epistemologias Reticulares E a Crise Do Antropomorfismo Social. Revista USP, 92, 6.
  8. Di Felice, M. (2017). Net-ativismo - Da ação social para o ato conectivo. Editora Paulus.
  9. Di Felice, M., Pireddu, M., De Kerckhove, D., de Miranda, J. B., Martinez, J. A. S., & Accoto, C. (2018). Manifesto pela Cidadania Digital. Lumina, 12(3), 3-7.
  10. Di Felice, M. (2020). A cidadania digital: a crise da ideia ocidental de democracia e a participação nas redes digitais. Paulus Editora.
  11. Di Felice, M., & Morais, M. M. D. (2021). Cidadanias pandêmicas. Perspectivas multidisciplinares da Comunicação em contexto de pandemia Vol. II, 2, 264-280.
  12. Floridi, L. (2015). Commentary on the Onlife Manifesto. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era (pp. 21–23). Springer Open. https://doi.org/I 10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6
  13. Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford.
  14. Haraway, D. J (2017). A Cyborg Manifesto: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 224.
  15. Kastrup, V. (1999). A invenção de si e do mundo: Uma introdução do tempo e do coletivo no estudo da cognição. Papirus.
  16. Kastrup, V. (2008). O método da cartografia e os quatro níveis da pesquisa-intervenção. In: Pesquisa-intervenção na infância e juventude (pp. 465-489). FAPERJ.
  17. Kastrup, V. (2007). O funcionamento da atenção no trabalho do cartógrafo. In: Psicol. Soc. [online], vol.19, n.1, pp. 15-22.
  18. Kastrup, V. (2008b). A cognição contemporânea e a aprendizagem inventiva. In E. P. Virginia Kastrup, Silvia Tedesco (Ed.), Políticas da Cognição (pp. 91–110). Sulina.
  19. Kastrup, V. (2019). Le fonctionnement de l’attention dans le travail du cartographe. In Multitudes (Vol. 75, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.075.0125
  20. Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oup Oxford.
  21. Matwyshyn, A. M. (2019). The internet of bodies. Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 61, 77.
  22. Moreira, J. A., & Schlemmer, E. (2020). Por um novo conceito e paradigma de educação digital onlife. Revista UFG, 20(26).
  23. Oliveira, L. C. de. (2021). Territórios do invenTAR–O corpo em rede e a Educação OnLIFE em tempos de wearable. Tese de Doutorado.
  24. Passos, E., Kastrup, V., & Escóssia, L. da. (2015). Pistas do método da cartografia V.1. In: Pesquisa- Intervenção e produção de subjetividade -V.1. Sulina.
  25. Passos, E., Kastrup, V., & Tedesco, S. (2016). Pistas do Método da Cartografia: A Experiência da Pesquisa e o Plano Comum - V.2. Sulina.
  26. Ribeiro, S. E. (2020). A cidade como rede conectiva de educação cidadã. Tese de Doutorado.
  27. Santaella, L. Humanos Hiper Híbridos. São Paulo- SP: Paulus, 2021.
  28. Schlemmer, E., & Di Felice, M. (2022). A (trans)formação do corpo em dados: um território a ser habitado pela educação digital em saúde. In.: Educação na Saúde: concepções, tendências e desafios. Editora Fiocruz. (em processo de publicação)
  29. Schlemmer, E., & Moreira, J. A. M. (2022). Do ensino remoto emergencial ao HyFlex:. Revista da FAEEBA- Educação e Contemporaneidade, v. 31, p. 138-155, 2022.
  30. Schlemmer, E. (2021). A pandemia proporcionou vários aprendizados. Revista TICs & EaD Em Foco, 7, 5–21.
  31. Schlemmer, E., Oliveira, L. C. de., & Menezes, J. (2021). O habitar do ensinar e do aprender em tempos de pandemia e a virtualidade de uma educação OnLIFE. Práxis Educacional, 17(45), 1-25.
  32. Schlemmer, E. (2020). A Pandemia proporcionou várias aprendizagens. Revista PoloUm, São Luís - MA, p. 5 - 11, 30 dez. 2020.
  33. Schlemmer, E., & Di Felice, M., & Serra, I. M. R. de S. Educação OnLIFE: a dimensão ecológica das arquiteturas digitais de aprendizagem. Educar em Revista, [S. l.], 2020.
  34. Schlemmer, E., Morgado, L. C., & Moreira, J. A. (2020). Educação e transformação digital: O habitar do ensinar e do aprender, epistemologias reticulares e ecossistemas de inovação. Interfaces da Educação, 11(32), 764–790.
  35. Schlemmer, E., & Moreira, J. A. M. (2020). Ampliando conceitos para o paradigma de educação digital OnLIFE. Interacções, 16(55), 103-122.