Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 28, 2022
Published
Dec 28, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 259 Download : 162

Main Article Content

Abstract

The digital turn has shaken at its foundations the «mass society», the label that entered the lexicon of social sciences in the Twentieth century, accompanying advanced industrial societies for a long time (Gili, 1990), before their transformation into post-industrial ones (Touraine, 1969). The new context in which the increasingly important role assumed by telematic technologies and Information and communication technologies has opened...

Keywords

Digital Citizenship

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Panarari, M. (2022). The transformations of “public sphere” category, and the contemporary debate about digital citizenship. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135814

References

  1. Bencivenga, E. (2022). La logica dei paradossi. Milano: Utet.
  2. Bennet, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (Eds.) (2001). Mediated Politics. Communication in the Future of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bentivegna, S., & Boccia Artieri, G. (2021). Voci della democrazia. Il futuro del dibattito pubblico. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  4. Bianco A. (2019). The Next Society. Sociologia del mutamento e dei processi digitali. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  5. Bernstein, R. (1994). La nuova costellazione. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  6. Blumler J. (Ed.) (1992). Television and the Public Interest. Vulnerable Values in Western European Broadcasting. London: Sage.
  7. Blumler, J., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209-230. doi: 10.1080/105846099198596
  8. Calise, M. (2000). Il partito personale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  9. Castells, M. (2002). La nascita della società in rete. Milano: Università Bocconi Editore.
  10. Ceccarini, L. (2015). La cittadinanza online. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  11. Chadwick, A. (2013). Hybrid Media System. Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Codeluppi, V. (2021). Vetrinizzazione. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  13. Dahlgren, P. (2020), The Public Sphere and the Net: Structure, Space, and Communication, in Bennett, W. L. and Entman R. M. (eds.), Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Davis, A. (2019). Political Communication. A New Introduction for Crisis Times. Polity: Cambridge.
  15. Diamanti, I. (2014). Democrazia ibrida. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  16. Eco, U. (1965). Apocalittici e integrati. Milano: Bompiani.
  17. Foucault, M. (1966). Les Mots et les Choses. Paris: Gallimard.
  18. Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
  19. Grossi, G. (2004). L’opinione pubblica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  20. Habermas, J. (2002). Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica. Bari-Roma: Laterza (ed. originaria 1962).
  21. Kant, I. (2017). Che cos’è l’illuminismo?. Roma: Editori Riuniti.
  22. Kant, I. (2004). Per la pace perpetua. Roma: Armando.
  23. Keane, J. (2013). Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Lazar, J. (1995). L’opinion publique. Paris: Sirey.
  25. Luhmann, N., & De Giorgi, R. (1996). Teoria della società. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  26. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
  27. Manin, B. (2010). Principi del governo rappresentativo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  28. Mattelart, A. (2002). Storia della società dell’informazione. Torino: Einaudi.
  29. Mordacci, R. (2017). La condizione neomoderna. Torino: Einaudi.
  30. Nieminen, H. (2008). Social Networks and the European Public Sphere, in Bondeberg, I. and Madsen, P. (eds.), Media, Democracy, and European Culture. Bristol: Intellect.
  31. Marinelli, A. (2021). Educare alla cittadinanza digitale nell’era della platform society. Scuola democratica, 5, 121-133; doi: 10.12828/100673.
  32. Marshall, P. D. (2014). Celebrity and Power. Fame in Contemporary Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  33. Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle. Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Palano, D. (2020). Bubble democracy. La fine del pubblico e la nuova polarizzazione. Brescia: Morcelliana.
  35. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics. Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  36. Pettegree, A. (2015). L’invenzione delle notizie. Torino: Einaudi.
  37. Postman, N. (2021). Divertirsi da morire. Roma: Luiss University Press (ed. or. 1985).
  38. Pupo, S. (2020). David Hume. The sceptical conservative. Milano-Udine: Mimesis International.
  39. Rolando, S. (Ed.) (2011). Teoria e tecniche della comunicazione pubblica. Milano: Rizzoli-Etas.
  40. Rospocher, M. (Ed.) (2013). Oltre la sfera pubblica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  41. Sartori, G. (1987). Elementi di teoria politica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  42. Shankar Pandey, U. (2019). The Digital Turn in Media and Communication Studies. Media Watch: an international research journal on communication and media, 10/2, 5-21.
  43. Schlesinger, P. (2020). After the post-public sphere?. Media, Culture & Society, 7-8, 1545-1563.
  44. Schudson, M. (2010). Il buon cittadino. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  45. Sorice, M. (2020). La «piattaformizzazione» della sfera pubblica. Comunicazione Politica, 3, 371-388. doi: 10.3270/98799.
  46. Sorice, M. (2020). Sociologia dei media. Un’introduzione critica. Roma, Carocci.
  47. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. London: Polity Press.
  48. Thompson, M. (2016). Enough Said. What’s gone wrong with the language of politics?. London: Vintage Publishing.
  49. Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. New York: William Morrow.
  50. Turkle, S. (2016). La conversazione necessaria. Torino: Einaudi.
  51. Urbinati, N. (2012). Liberi e uguali. Contro l’ideologia individualistica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  52. Vaccari, C. (2012). La politica online. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  53. Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., &De Waal, M. (2019). Platform Society. Milano: Guerini Scientifica.
  54. Volkmer, I. (2014). The Global Public Sphere. Public Communication in the Age of Reflective Interdependence. Cambridge: Polity.