Main Article Content

Abstract

The western idea of society, founded on a contrast between citizens and limited to the cohabitation of human subjects, just as the idea of citizenship is based on the fundamental rights of people, faced with the challenges of the pandemic, of the climate change and those posed by the latest generation of intelligence network, turns out to be inadequate. The digital citizenship of today is the research area in which to search for the overcoming of the Western political project and to begin a new culture of governance within complex networks characterized by interactions within an architecture that is no longer composed either of subjects nor objects. The present article, starting from the analysis of the digital protagonism of the non-human, present the possible meanings of the crisis of the western idea of the world.

Keywords

Digital Citizenship Non Human Networks Digital Governance Datafication

Article Details

How to Cite
Di Felice, M. (2022). Digital citizenship and the end of an idea of world. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(3), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135816

References

  1. Accoto, C. (2017). Il mondo dato. Milano, Egea.
  2. Accoto, C. (2019). Il mondo ex machina. Milano, Egea.
  3. Appadurai, A. (1986). The social life of things. Cambridge, University Press.
  4. Campagna, F. (2021). Magia e Tecnica. Roma, Ed. Tlon.
  5. Cardon, D., & Granjon, F. (2010). Mediactivistes. Paris, SciencesPo Les Presses.
  6. Coccia, E. (2016). Le vie des plantes. Une metaphysique du mélange. Paris, Ed. Payot &Rivage.
  7. Crutzen, P. (2005). Benvenuti nell’ antropocene! (a cura di A. Parlangeli). Milano, Mondadori.
  8. De Castro, E. V. (2009). Metaphysiquescannibales. Paris, Puf.
  9. Di Corinto, A., & Tozzi, T. (2002). Hacktivism. Roma, Il Manifesto.
  10. Di Felice, M. (2020). La cittadinanza digitale. Milano, Meltemi.
  11. Di Felice, M. (2017). Net-attivismo dall’ azione sociale all’atto connettivo. Roma, Ed. Estemporanee.
  12. Di Felice, M. (2016). Paysages post-urbains. La fin de l’ experience urbaine et le formes communicatives de l’habiter. Paris, CNRS Editiones.
  13. Eco, U. (1995). Opera Aperta. Milano, Bompiani.
  14. Floridi, L. (2017). La quarta rivoluzione. Milano, Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  15. Gallino, L. (2007). Tecnologia e democrazia. Torino, Einaudi.
  16. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble – Making kin in the chthulucene. Chicago, University Chicago Press.
  17. Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’ avons jamais étémodernes. Paris, Decouverte.
  18. Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  19. Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia. Cambridge, Polity Press.
  20. Le Guin, U. K. (1999). Il mondo della foresta. Milano, Editrice Nord.
  21. Lovelock, J. (2016). Gaia. A new look at life on Earth. Oxford, University Press.
  22. Lovelock, J. (2020). Novacene, l’età dell’iperintelligenza. Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.
  23. Mancuso, S. (2017). Plant Revolution. Firenze, Ed. Giunti.
  24. Mancuso, S. (2020). La pianta del mondo. Bari, Ed. Laterza.
  25. Moore, J.W. (2016) Anthropocene or Capitalcene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism, in J.W. Moore (Ed.), Anthropocene or Capitalocene?. Oakland, PM Press
  26. Morton, T. (2018). Iperoggetti, filosofia ed ecologia dopo la fine del mondo. Roma, Ed. Nero.
  27. Perniola, M. (1997). L’estetica del novecento. Bologna, Il Mulino.
  28. Perniola, M. (1999). O sex appeal do inorgânico. S. Paulo Ed. Studio Nobel.
  29. Pitteri, D. (2007). Democrazia elettronica. Roma-Bari, Laterza.
  30. Puech, M. (2008). Homo Sapiens Technologicus. Paris, Le Pommier.
  31. Rodotà, S. (2014). Il mondo nella rete. Quali i diritti, quali i vicoli. Roma-Bari, Laterza.
  32. Serres, M. (2019). Le contrat naturel. Paris, Ed. Le Pommier.
  33. Stengers, I. (2005). Comsopolitiche. Roma, Sossella editore.