Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 8, 2024
Accepted
Sep 29, 2024
Published
Oct 27, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 110 Download : 74

Main Article Content

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examines the relationship between the integration of the AI-driven educational platform BrainPOP, teacher digital competencies, and the development of students’ research skills in elementary and secondary education in Tehran, Iran. The study focuses on four primary objectives: (1) identifying strategies for integrating BrainPOP in teaching and learning, (2) assessing the influence of teacher digital competencies on successful BrainPOP integration, (3) analyzing the impact of BrainPOP on students’ research skills, and (4) exploring the interconnected roles of BrainPOP, teacher digital competencies, and students’ research skills development. Participants include 100 elementary and secondary school teachers and 200 students from Tehran, Iran. Data is collected using surveys, interviews, and classroom observations, and analyzed through descriptive statistics, regression, and thematic coding. Key findings for each objective include: 1. Diverse strategies for integrating BrainPOP in the classroom, 2. A positive correlation between teacher digital competencies and successful BrainPOP adoption, 3. Enhanced student research skills linked to the use of BrainPOP, and 4. The significance of a supportive learning environment that fosters collaboration, critical thinking, and adaptability among students, teachers, and AI tools in Iran. This study highlights the need for different ways to use BrainPOP, improving teachers’ digital skills, and creating a supportive learning environment to help students improve their research skills in elementary and secondary schools. The results provide essential information for education practices and policies in Iran and other places, highlighting that AI tools like BrainPOP can significantly enhance how students learn and develop their research abilities.

Keywords

AI education AI competency Teacher competency Teaching competency Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Behnamnia, N., Hayati, S., Kamsin, A., Ahmadi, A., & Alizadeh, Z. (2024). Enhancing Students’ Research Skills Through AI Tools and Teacher Competencies: A Mixed-Methods Study . Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 20(3), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135960

References

  1. Adnan, M., Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2024). Profiling teacher educators: ready to prepare the next generation for educational technology use? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2024.2322481 
  2. Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), 12983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983 
  3. Barak, M., Ashkar, T., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Computers & education, 56(3), 839-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.025 
  4. Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Science education in primary schools: is an animation worth a thousand pictures? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 608-620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9315-2 
  5. Beardsley, M., Albó, L., Aragón, P., & Hernández‐Leo, D. (2021). Emergency education effects on teacher abilities and motivation to use digital technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1455-1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13101 
  6. Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., Ismail, M. A. B., & Hayati, A. (2018). The main components of creativity in educational game: A case study. Emerging Technologies in Computing: First International Conference, iCETiC 2018, London, UK, August 23–24, 2018, Proceedings 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95450-9_25 
  7. Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-4136.vid 
  8. Canal, M. N., de las Mercedes de Obesso, M., & Rivera, C. A. P. (2024). Does educators’ digital competence improve entrepreneurial students’ learning outcomes? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00921-x 
  9. Castañeda, L., Esteve-Mon, F. M., Adell, J., & Prestridge, S. (2022). International insights about a holistic model of teaching competence for a digital era: the digital teacher framework reviewed. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 493-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1991304 
  10. Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in human behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468 
  11. Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y 
  12. Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a 
  13. Chen, C.-H., Shih, C.-C., & Law, V. (2020). The effects of competition in digital game-based learning (DGBL): a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1855-1873.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09794-1 
  14. Chiu, T. K., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118 
  15. Conrads, J., Rasmussen, M., Winters, N., Geniet, A., Langer, L., Redecker, C., Kampylis, P., Bacigalupo, M., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digital education policies in Europe and beyond. JRC Science for policy report. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.1150 
  16. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2 
  17. Dunn, T. J., & Kennedy, M. (2019). Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement. Computers & education, 137, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.004 
  18. Esteve-Mon, F., Llopis, M., & Adell-Segura, J. (2020). Digital competence and computational thinking of student teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(2), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11588 
  19. Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389 
  20. Fernández, R. G., & Garrido, D. C. (2023). Challenges of social media in education: review and bibliometric analysis of scientific production to map trends and perspectives. Innoeduca: international journal of technology and educational innovation, 9(2), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2023.v9i2.16340 
  21. Galindo-Domínguez, H., & Bezanilla, M.-J. (2019). A systematic review of flipped classroom methodology at university level in Spain. Innoeduca. International journal of technology and educational innovation, 5(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2019.v5i1.4470 
  22. Giménez, F. J. P., & Porlán, I. G. (2017). Implementación y análisis de una experiencia de flipped classroom en Educación Musical. Innoeduca. International journal of technology and educational innovation, 3(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2017.v3i1.1964 
  23. Gong, Y. (2021). Application of virtual reality teaching method and artificial intelligence technology in digital media art creation. Ecological Informatics, 63, 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101304 
  24. Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & García, M. G. (2023). Digital competence of teachers in the use of ICT for research work: development of an instrument from a PLS-SEM approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16509-16529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11895-2 
  25. Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & Gómez-García, M. (2023). Digital competences in research: creativity and entrepreneurship as essential predictors for teacher training. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00299-3 
  26. Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Gómez-García, M., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2024). Digital competence in research work: predictors that have an impact on it according to the type of university and gender of the Higher Education teacher:[Digital competence in research work: predictors that have an impact on it according to the type of university and gender of the Higher Education teacher]. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 69, 7-34. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.99992 
  27. Haşlaman, T., Atman Uslu, N., & Mumcu, F. (2024). Development and in-depth investigation of pre-service teachers’ digital competencies based on DigCompEdu: a case study. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 961-986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01674-z 
  28. Hayati, S., & Behnamnia, N. (2023). Exploring Game Behavior, Scaffolding, and Learning Mathematics in Digital Game-based Learning Apps on Children. J Mod Educ Res, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.53964/jmer.2023005 
  29. Heinz, J. (2016). Digital skills and the influence of students’ socio-economic background. An exploratory study in German elementary schools. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 8, 186-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112747 
  30. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. In Globethics Publications. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068 
  31. Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01674-z 
  32. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 
  33. Kirschner, P., & Selinger, M. (2003). The state of affairs of teacher education with respect to information and communications technology. Technology, pedagogy and education, 12(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390300200143 
  34. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687667 
  35. Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services (Vol. 2). Libraries Unlimited Westport, CT. https://doi.org/10.2307/40323160 
  36. Lai, J. W., & Cheong, K. H. (2022). Educational opportunities and challenges in augmented reality: Featuring implementations in physics education. IEEE Access, 10, 43143-43158. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3166478 
  37. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of educational research, 77(4), 575-614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921 
  38. Liaw, S.-S., & Huang, H.-M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & education, 60(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015 
  39. Liu, Y., Chen, L., & Yao, Z. (2022). The application of artificial intelligence assistant to deep learning in teachers’ teaching and students’ learning processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 929175.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929175 
  40. Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & du Boulay, B. (2022). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100076 
  41. Martínez, A. M. (2019). Aprendizaje móvil en Educación Física. Una propuesta de innovación en ESO. Innoeduca. International journal of technology and educational innovation, 5(2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2019.v5i2.5082 
  42. Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (2009). The handbook of social research ethics. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971 
  43. Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(3), 103434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434 
  44. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610 
  45. Najmeh, B. (2021). A STEM game based learning apps model to enhance creativity among preschoolers/Najmeh Behnamnia Universiti Malaya].
  46. Napal Fraile, M., Peñalva-Vélez, A., & Mendióroz Lacambra, A. M. (2018). Development of digital competence in secondary education teachers’ training. Education Sciences, 8(3), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030104 
  47. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6 
  48. Oguguo, B., Ezechukwu, R., Nannim, F., & Offor, K. (2023). Analysis of teachers in the use of digital resources in online teaching and assessment in COVID times. Innoeduca. International journal of technology and educational innovation, 9(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2023.v9i1.15419 
  49. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117407 
  50. Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts–a review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1005-1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3 
  51. Raywid, M. A. (1995). Alternative schools: The state of the art. Educational leadership, 52(1), 26-31.
  52. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. https://doi.org/10.46403/akulturavaltashatasaegyeni.2020.74 
  53. Rodríguez, M. U., Cantabrana, J. L. L., & Cervera, M. G. (2021). Validation of a tool for self-evaluating teacher digital competence. Educación XXI, 24(1), 353-373. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.27080 
  54. Rosen, Y., Rushkin, I., Hubert, B., Hogan, M., & Dawood, M. (2022). Efficacy Research Report: The Effects of BrainPOP and BrainPOP Jr. on Learning Outcomes in Literacy, Math and Science.
  55. Şimşek, A. S., & Ateş, H. (2022). The extended technology acceptance model for Web 2.0 technologies in teaching. Innoeduca. International journal of technology and educational innovation, 8(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2022.v8i2.15413 
  56. Suelves, D. M., Esteve, M. I. V., Chacón, J. P., & Alonso, Á. S. M. (2019). Competencia digital transversal en la formación del profesorado, análisis de una experiencia. Innoeduca. International journal of technology and educational innovation, 5(1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2019.v5i1.4890 
  57. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th Еd.). In: Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0904_9 
  58. Tan, S. (2023). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for innovation in education. In Learning intelligence: Innovative and digital transformative learning strategies: Cultural and social engineering perspectives (pp. 335-363). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9201-8_8 
  59. Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2022). Development and validation of students’ digital competence scale (SDiCoS). International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00330-0 
  60. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.  https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4 
  61. Wu, R., & Yu, Z. (2024). Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 10-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334 
  62. Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212 
  63. Zhu, Z.-T., Yu, M.-H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments, 3, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2 

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'