Main Article Content
Abstract
The issue of motivation in synchronous online teaching and learning is still an area of continued research and development. This research seeks to determine the roles played by cognitive presence, teaching presence and social presence concerning external and internal motivational factors and the students’ academic performance with a particular focus on the effect of the two motivational factors on the English performances of EFL learners learning online in a parallel mode. Questionnaires were administered to 233 EFL students at a private university in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam. The effects of the research variables under consideration were analyzed by Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings indicate that cognitive presence significantly influences both external and internal motivation. Teaching presence positively impacts external motivation, but not internal motivation or academic performance. Whereas social presence does not significantly affect motivation or academic performance. External motivation was found to positively influence academic performance, while internal motivation showed no significant effect. These results suggest that enhancing cognitive and teaching presences can effectively enhance students' external motivation, which in turn improves academic performance in synchronous online EFL learning. The study highlights the need for well-designed instructional strategies and active facilitation to engage students. The study’s limitations include employing cross-sectional research design, and participants engaging in one institution only, a recommendation for future research, that is, the use of longitudinal research designs and large samples. These findings are crucial for educators and policymakers who aim to optimize online educational strategies to enhance students' ...
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.
The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.
For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code
References
- Afzal, F., & Crawford, L. (2022). Student's perception of engagement in online project management education and its impact on performance: The mediating role of self-motivation. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100057.
- Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.
- Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3-22.
- Alamer, A., & Lee, J. (2019). A motivational process model explaining L2 Saudi students’ achievement of English. System, 87, 1-55.
- Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2023). Cognitive presence in learner–content interaction process: The role of scaffolding in online self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-31.
- Ariani, D. (2016). Why do I study? The mediating effect of motivation and self-regulation on student performance. Business, Management and Education, 14(2), 153-178.
- Artino Jr, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 146-151.
- Aslam, R., Khan, N., & Joseph, V. (2021). Impact of learning motivation on students’ academic achievement: Mediating role of constructive feedback. Pak Soc Sci Rev, 5(3), 472-484.
- Badali, M., Hatami, J., Banihashem, S. K., Rahimi, E., Noroozi, O., & Eslami, Z. (2022). The role of motivation in MOOCs’ retention rates: a systematic literature review. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 5.
- Berdida, D. J. E., & Grande, R. A. N. (2023). Nursing students’ nomophobia, social media use, attention, motivation, and academic performance: a structural equation modeling approach. Nurse Education in practice, 70, 103645.
- Bilal, M., Dada, M., Nasir, H., & Khalid, U. (2022). E-learning trends in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Education.
- Bokolo, A. J., Petersen, S. A., Lin, J., & Alenazi, M. (2020). Impact of digital tools on e-learning systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education.
- Carreira, J. M. (2012). Motivational orienations and psychological needs in EFL learning among elementary school students in Japan. System, 40(2), 191-202.
- Choy, J. L. F., & Quek, C. L. (2016). Modelling relationships between students’ academic achievement and community of inquiry in an online learning environment for a blended course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 106-124.
- Clayton, K., Blumberg, F., & Auld, D. P. (2010). The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 349-364.
- Dikkers, A. G., Whiteside, A. L., & Tap, B. (2017). Social presence: Understanding connections among definitions, theory, measurements, and practice. In Social Presence in Online Learning (pp. 11-25). Routledge.
- Dinh, C. T. (2023). Impact of Synchronous Online Learning Environment on Students' Cognitive Engagement and Learning Outcomes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(3), 22-38.
- Elshareif, E., & Mohamed, E. A. (2021). The Effects of E-Learning on Students' Motivation to Learn in Higher Education. Online Learning, 25(3), 128-143.
- Fang, X. (2015, August). Research of the MOOC study behavior influencing factors. In 2015 3d International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technology for Education (ICAICTE-2015) (pp. 18-22). Atlantis Press.
- Fiock, H. (2020). Fostering cognitive presence in online courses: A systematic review (2008-2020). Online Learning, 26(1), pp. 130-149.
- Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100692.
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7-23.
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
- Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and higher education, 10(3), 157-172.
- Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Routledge.
- Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30-50. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12020.
- Hakan, K., & Münire, E. (2014). Academic motivation: Gender, domain and grade differences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 708-715.
- Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of educational psychology, 102(3), 588.
- Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text‐based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89-106.
- Kreijns, K., Xu, K., & Weidlich, J. (2022). Social presence: Conceptualization and measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 139-170.
- Kožuh, I., Jeremić, Z., Sarjaš, A., Bele, J. L., Devedžić, V., & Debevc, M. (2015). Social presence and interaction in learning environments: The effect on student success. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 223-236.
- Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12.
- Li, W., & Wang, W. (2024). The impact of teaching presence on students’ online learning experience: evidence from 334 Chinese universities during the pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1-11.
- Lim, J. (2023). Exploring the relationships between interaction measures and learning outcomes through social network analysis: the mediating role of social presence. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 14.
- Łockiewicz, M. (2019). The role of motivation in learning foreign languages: towards a global self-identity–a literature analysis. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 7(2), 81-90.
- Lowenthal, P. R., & Moore, R. L. (2020). Exploring student perceptions of Flipgrid in online courses. Online learning, 24(4), 28-41.
- Ma, L., Duan, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Mediating role of motivation on the effects of teacher-student relationships on foreign language achievement. Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, (33), 129-144.
- Meng, X., & Hu, Z. (2022). The relationship between student motivation and academic performance: the mediating role of online learning behavior. Quality Assurance in Education, 31(1), 167-180.
- Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students’ online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1-9.
- Mitchell, C., Cours Anderson, K., Laverie, D., & Hass, A. (2021). Distance be damned: The importance of social presence in a pandemic constrained environment. Marketing Education Review, 31(4), 294-310.
- Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., de Vries, P., Hennis, T., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2018). Social presence in massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3).
- Riyanti, D. (2019). The role of motivation in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (JELTIM), 1(1), 29-35.
- Rodriguez, M. (2015). The relationship between social presence, student satisfaction and academic achievement in fully online asynchronous courses. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
- Shi, Y., Tong, M., & Long, T. (2021). Investigating relationships among blended synchronous learning environments, students’ motivation, and cognitive engagement: A mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 168, 104193.
- Tan, C. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on student learning performance from the perspectives of community of inquiry. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(6), 1215-1228.
- Tokan, M. K., & Imakulata, M. M. (2019). The effect of motivation and learning behaviour on student achievement. South African Journal of Education, 39(1).
- Tucker, C. M., Zayco, R. A., Herman, K. C., Reinke, W. M., Trujillo, M., Carraway, K., ... & Ivery, P. D. (2002). Teacher and child variables as predictors of academic engagement among low-income African American children. Psychology in the Schools, 39(4), 477-488.
- Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational psychologist, 41(1), 19-31.
- Wang, J., Zhang, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Effects of teacher engagement on students’ achievement in an online English as a foreign language classroom: The mediating role of autonomous motivation and positive emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 950652.
- Wang, T., Manta, O., & Zhang, Y. (2023). The Relationship Between Learning Motivation and Online Learning Performance: The Mediating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy and Flow Experience. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(23), 27-38.
- Werang, B. R., Jampel, I. N., Agung, A. A. G., Putri, H. W. S., & Asaloei, S. I. (2022). Teacher teaching performance, students’ learning motivation and academic achievement. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(12), 4672-4682.
- Widiatmaka, F. P. (2021). Does Student Motivation and Teaching Presence Influence Academic Performance? Examining The Role of Cognitive Presence. In International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology, 7, 944-948.
- Widjaja, A. E., & Chen, J. V. (2017). Online learners’ motivation in online learning: the effect of online-participation, social presence, and collaboration. Learning technologies in education: Issues and trends, 12(2), 72-93.
- Yan, L., Whittaker, M., & Majeski, R. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education.
- Yung, L. (2023). Role of Motivation in Learning English Foreign Language on the Academic Achievements of Students in China. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(1), 39-49.
- Young, M. R. (2005). The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self-regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1), 25-40.
- Zhu, Y., Xu, S., Wang, W., Zhang, L., Liu, D., Liu, Z., & Xu, Y. (2022). The impact of online and offline learning motivation on learning performance: the mediating role of positive academic emotion. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 8921-8938.