Main Article Content

Abstract

The growing spread of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) across multiple contexts of use has triggered the transformation of traditional educational environments to welcome their use in ordinary teaching and learning processes. However, the mere availability and supply of educational technologies does not guarantee the activation of meaningful and inclusive trajectories for technology integration in the classroom, as the knowledge and competences of teachers and students is still the primary factor to drive an equitable and effective use of technology as a didactic mediator. Considering the challenges of teacher training within an ever-changing technological landscape, this paper focuses on the Italian national context, analysing the perceptions of 830 Italian teachers participating in a training course for teachers (30 credits Training, Prime Ministerial Decree of 4 August 2023) with reference to the use of ICTs in their previous teaching experience. The Italian version of the Intrapersonal Technology Integration Scale (ITIS) was implemented as a tool to collect data and examine the dynamic relationship between the teachers’ perceived competences on educational technologies and the factual use they make of them to support teaching across disciplines. Results show useful insights on the reasons underlying the choice of implementing and integrating technology in ordinary teaching practices and unveil possible trajectories to reshape the training paths for teachers. In this sense, this contribution unfolds a deeper analysis of the intersection between teacher professionalism, educational technologies and educational systems’ inclusiveness and efficacy.

Keywords

Teacher training Information and Communication Technologies Educational Technologies Inclusive Education Intrapersonal Technology Integration Scale

Article Details

How to Cite
Santilli, T., Ceccacci, S., Del Bianco, N., D’Angelo, I., & Giaconi, C. (2025). Integrating educational technologies: critical analysis and perspectives from teacher training students. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1136022

References

  1. Adu, E. O., & Zondo, S. S. (2023). Perceptions of educators on ICT integration into the teaching and learning of economics. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, 1, 61-71.
  2. Alférez-Pastor, M., Collado-Soler, R., Lérida-Ayala, V., Manzano-León, A., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., & Trigueros, R. (2023). Training Digital Competencies in Future Primary School Teachers: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci., 13, 461.
  3. Benigno V., Chiorri C., Chifari A., & Manca S. (2013). Adattamento italiano della Intrapersonal Technology Integration Scale, uno strumento per misurare gli atteggiamenti degli insegnanti nei confronti delle TIC. Giornale italiano di psicologia, 40(4), 815-838.
  4. Benigno V., Panesi, S., Dalla Mutta, E., Caruso, G., Fante, C., & Ferlino, L. (2023). Online video training to improve digital competence and computer self-efficacy for Support Teachers. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 1-25.
  5. Bhattacharjee, P., Baker, S., & Waycott, J. (2020). Older adults and their acquisition of digital skills: A review of current research evidence. Proceedings of the 32nd Australian conference on human-computer Interaction, 437-443.
  6. Bilyalova, A. A., Salimova, D., & Zelenina, T. (2019). Digital Transformation in Education. Integrated Science in Digital Age, 265–276.
  7. Bocconi, S., Panesi, S., & Kampylis, P., Fostering the digital competence of schools: piloting SELFIE in the Italian education context. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 15(4), (2020), 417-425.
  8. Braga, A. (2017). Digital transformation. Milano: EGEA.
  9. Butera, F., Batruch, A., Autin, F., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., & Pulfrey, C. (2020). Teaching as Social Influence: Empowering Teachers to Become Agents of Social Change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 15(1), 323-355.
  10. Cadet, L. B., Reynaud, E. & Chainay, H. (2022). Memory for a virtual reality experience in children and adults according to image quality, emotion, and sense of presence. Virtual Reality, 26(1), 55-75.
  11. Caldarelli A., D’Angelo I., & Del Bianco N. (2023). Digital Inclusion: le percezioni dei docenti di sostegno in formazione. In F. Peluso Cassese (Ed.), Ricerche in neuroscienze educative 2023 Il futuro prossimo dell’educazione nell’universo digitale, (pp. 158-159). Roma: Edizioni Universitarie Romane.
  12. Calvani, A., & Vivanet, G. (2014). Tecnologie per apprendere: quale il ruolo dell’Evidence Based Education? Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 10, 83-112.
  13. Chandrasena, M. (2019). Lack of digital competence: The hump in a university - English for specific purpose - Classroom. IJSTR, 8, 948-956.
  14. Di Paolo, A., Beatini, V., Di Tore, S., & Todino, M. (2023). How serious can promote inclusion, history and cultural heritage through the Virtual Reality. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 1-8.
  15. Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers ‘attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 733-761.
  16. Ertmer P. A. (2005), Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 53, 25-40.
  17. Escudero, V. G., Gutiérrez, R. C., & Somoza, J. A. G. C. (2019). Análisis de la autopercepción sobre el nivel de competencia digital docente en la formación inicial de maestros/as. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 22(3), 193-218.
  18. European Union, (2024). Women in Digital Scoreboard 2022. Country Profiles. Retrieved July 24th, 2024, from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi.
  19. Giaconi, C., D’Angelo, I., Marfoglia, A., Gentilozzi, C. (2023). Ecosistemi formativi inclusivi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  20. Giaconi, C., Del Bianco, N., D'Angelo, I., & Capellini, S. A. (2024). Il metodo di studio: indagine esplorativa sulle percezioni di docenti in formazione. In A. Marfoglia & L. Borsini (Eds.), La formazione inclusiva: itinerari di Pedagogia e Didattica Speciale, (pp. 7–30). Londra: Edizioni Accademiche Italiane.
  21. Giaconi, C., Del Bianco, N., D’Angelo, I., Caldarelli, A., Capellini, S. A. (2023). Video as educational mediator: Exploratory reserch to perceptions of teachers in training. Education Sciences & Society, 14(1), 358-278.
  22. Giaconi, C., Capellini, S. A, Del Bianco, N., Taddei, A., & D'Angelo, I. (2019). Empowerment per l'inclusione nello studio. Scienze e società dell'educazione, 2.
  23. Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441-449.
  24. Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231.
  25. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 275-285.
  26. Hamburg, I. & Bucksch, S. (2015). ICT-based approaches to support learners with disabilities. Journal of educational policy and entrepreneurial research, 2(6), 1-12.
  27. Hankey, V. P., Price-Dennis, D., & Matthews, G. (2017). Continuous Becoming: Moving toward Mastery: Teacher Education in the Digital Age. The English Journal, 106(5), 97–100.
  28. Hargittai, E., Piper, A.M. & Morris, M.R. (2019). From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults. Univ Access Inf Soc, 18, 881–890.
  29. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integration ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 155-192.
  30. Iommi, M., Del Bianco, N., D’Angelo, I., Aparecida Capellini, S., & Giaconi, C. (2021). La Gamification. Un’esperienza immersiva per la relazione educativa inclusiva. In N. Del Bianco, E. Brocchini, & Crescenzi G. (Eds.), La formazione dell’insegnante specializzato nella scuola secondaria. Esperienze e progetti a confronto (pp. 132-143). Londra: Edizioni Accademiche Italiane.
  31. Ismail, S. A. A., Almekhlafi, A. G., & Al-Mekhlafy, M. H. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the use of technology in teaching languages in United Arab Emirates’ schools. International Journal for Research in Education, 27(1), 37-56.
  32. Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT). Livelli di istruzione e ritorni occupazionali. Retrieved on January 28th, 2025, from: www.istat.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/REPORT-livelli-istruzione.pdf
  33. Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme, Teacher development, 11(2), 149-173.
  34. Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.
  35. Kent, A. M., & Giles, R. M. (2017). Preservice Teachers' Technology Self-Efficacy. SRATE Journal, 26(1), 9-20.
  36. Kuroda, R., Lopez, M., Sasaki, J., & Settecase, M. (2019). The digital gender gap. W20 Japan, EY-GSMA. Retrieved July 24th, 2024, from: https://www.gsma.com.
  37. Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 18, 1-32
  38. Larsen, M. A. (2010). Troubling the discourse of teacher centrality: a comparative perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 207-231.
  39. Lemon, N., & Garvis, S. (2016). Pre-service teacher self-efficacy in digital technology. Teachers and Teaching, 22(3), 387-408.
  40. Limone, P., Dipace, A., & Martiniello, L. (2016). Insegnanti e media digitali. Fattori socio-cognitivi e motivazionali che riducono le resistenze all'innovazione, Pedagogia oggi, 2, 248-257.
  41. Loveless, A. & Ellis, V. (2001). ICT, Pedagogy and the Curriculum. London: Routledge Falmer.
  42. Mariscal, J., Mayne, G., Aneja, U., & Sorgner, A. (2019). Bridging the gender digital gap. Economics, 13(1), 20190009.
  43. Masenya, T. M. (2021). Digital Literacy Skills as Prerequisite for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Institutions. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies, 39(2), 1-20.
  44. Ministero della Giustizia (2023). Decreto Ministeriale 4 agosto 2023, n. 109, “Regolamento concernente l'individuazione di ulteriori categorie dell'albo dei consulenti tecnici di ufficio e dei settori di specializzazione di ciascuna categoria, l'individuazione dei requisiti per l'iscrizione all'albo, nonchè la formazione, la tenuta e l'aggiornamento dell'elenco nazionale” (Italia). Gazzetta Ufficiale, 1–42.
  45. Ministero dell’Istruzione (2022). Decreto Ministeriale 14 giugno 2022, n. 161, “Adozione del “Piano Scuola 4.0” in attuazione della linea di investimento 3.2 “Scuola 4.0: scuole innovative, cablaggio, nuovi ambienti di apprendimento e laboratori” nell’ambito della Missione 4 – Componente 1 – del Piano nazionale di ripresa e resilienza, finanziato dall’Unione europea – Next Generation EU” (Italia). Gazzetta Ufficiale, 1–24.
  46. Morganti, F. & Riva, G. (2006). Conoscenza, comunicazione e tecnologia. Aspetti cognitivi della realtà virtuale. Milano: Edizioni Universitarie di lettere Economia e Diritto.
  47. Mortis, S., Valdés, A., Angulo, J., García, R. I, & Cuevas, O. (2013). Competencias digitales en docentes de educación secundaria. Municipio de un estado del noroeste de México. Perspectiva Educacional. Formación de Profesorado, 52(2), 135-153.
  48. Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica: Miliken Exchange on Education Technology.
  49. Muscarà, M., & Messina, R. (2014). Percezione delle competenze e dell’utilità d’uso delle tecnologie in classe e modelli di formazione dei docenti. Italian journal of educational research, 13, 181-196.
  50. Ni, L. B. (2012). ICT Use In Teaching and Learning of History An Education Review. International Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communications, 2(4), 428-433.
  51. Niederhauser, D. S., & Perkmen, S. (2008). Validation of the intrapersonal technology integration scale: Assessing the influence of intrapersonal factors that influence technology integration, Computers in the Schools, 25(1-2), 98-111.
  52. Nowak, B. M. (2019). The Development of Digital Competence of Students of Teacher Training Studies--Polish Cases. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(6), 262-266.
  53. OECD (2005). Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. OECD, Paris.
  54. Pantić, N., & Florian, L. (2015). Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Education Inquiry, 6(3).
  55. Pérez-Escoda, A., Castro-Zubizarreta, A., & Fandos-Igado, M. (2016b). Digital Skills in the Z Generation: Key Questions for a Curricular Introduction in Primary School. Comunicar, 24, 71-79.
  56. Perifanou, M. A., Economides, A. A., & Tzafilkou, K. (2021). Teachers' Digital Skills Readiness During COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16.
  57. Perkmen, S., & Pamuk, S. (2011). Social cognitive predictors of pre-service teachers’ technology integration performance. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 45-58.
  58. Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza. Retrieved July 29th, 2024, from:
  59. https://www.governo.it/sites/governo.it/files/PNRR.pdf
  60. Pinnelli, S., & Fiorucci, A. (2015). University and Flipped Learning TIC & DIL Project: Framework and Design. 12th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, 217-224.
  61. Pinnelli S., & Fiorucci A. (2020). Valutazione della componente tecnologica per la promozione dell'inclusione. Un'esperienza di ricerca-azione su base index rivolta a docenti di sostegno in formazione. MeTis - Mondi educativi. Temi, indagini, suggestioni, 10(1), 257-278.
  62. Potestio, A. (2022). La formazione continua per la professione docente. Formazione Lavoro Persona, XII(37), 9-21.
  63. Ray, B. B., Rogers, R. R., & Hocutt, M. M. (2020). Perceptions of non-STEM discipline teachers on coding as a teaching and learning tool: what are the possibilities? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36, 19-31.
  64. Reeves, S. M., Crippen, K. J., & McCray, E. D. (2021). The varied experience of undergraduate students learning chemistry in virtual reality laboratories. Computers & Education, 175, 104320
  65. Rogers, P. L. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 455-472.
  66. Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Santiago Campión, R., & Sánchez-Compaña, M. T. (2021). Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1858.
  67. Scolaro, K. (2020). The Use of ICTs to Teach Geography in the Classroom: Application examples for Foundation ‐ Grade 6. Information Technology Education and Society, 17(2), 23-49
  68. Starkey, L. (2020) A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37-56.
  69. Stringer, L. R., Lee, K. M., Sturm, S., & Giacaman, N. (2022). A systematic review of primary school teachers’ experiences with digital technologies curricula. Educ Inf Technol, 27, 12585–12607.
  70. Suárez-Rodríguez, J. M., Almerich, G., Díaz-García, I., & Fernández-Piqueras, R. (2012). Competencias del profesorado en las TIC. Influencia de factores personales y contextuales. Universitas Psychologica, 11(1), 293-309.
  71. Sugar W., Crawley F., & Fine B. (2004). Examining teachers’ decisions to adopt new technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 201-213.
  72. Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M. & Economides, A. A. (2023). Assessing teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education. Educ Inf Technol, 28, 16017–16040.
  73. United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved July 29th, 2024, from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  74. Vieira, R. M., Tenreiro-Vieira, C., Bem-haja, P., & Lucas, M. (2023). STEM Teachers’ Digital Competence: Different Subjects, Different Proficiencies. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1133.
  75. World Health Organization. (‎2001)‎. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization.
  76. Zubkovic, B. R., Pahljina-Reinić, R., & Kolić-Vehovec, S. (2022). Predictors of ICT Use in Teaching in Different Educational Domains. Humanities Today: Proceedings, 1, 75-91.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'