Main Article Content


This study belongs the field of learning analytics (LA) and considers data produced within digital learning environments. This study investigates the relationship between the standard psychometric properties of test questions and the information obtained from the log files produced, on a large scale, during test administration by computer. The results of this type of survey can help to make visible the intersections between formative and summative assessment and to renew the evaluation practices of a rapidly expanding sector such as digital education.


Learning Analytics Formative Assessment Summative Assessment Log File Process Data

Article Details

How to Cite
Palmiero, C., & Cecconi, L. (2019). Use of Learning Analytics in formative and summative evaluation. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 89-99.


  1. Bunderson C., Ynouye D., Olsen J. (1989), The four generations of computerized educational measurement, in Linn R. (ed), Educational measurement, 3rd ed. 367-408, Phoenix, AZ, American Council on Education.
  2. DiCerbo K. E., Behrens J. T. (2014) Impacts of the Digital Ocean on Education, London, Pearson. URL:
  3. Ercikan, K., Olivieri, M.E. (1989), In search of validity evidence in support of the interpretation and use of assessments of complex constructs. Discussion of research on assessing 21st century skills, Applied Measurement in Education, 29 (4), 310-318.
  4. Fullan M., Donnelly K. (2013), Alive in the swamp. Assessing digital innovations in education, Nesta-NewSchools, Report, URL:
  5. Harari, Y. N. (2018), 21 lessons for the 21st century, London, Random UK.
  6. Heckman, J.J., Humphries, J. E., Kautz, T. (eds) (2015), The myth of achievement tests, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  7. Hill P., Barber M. (2014), Preparing for a Renaissance in assessment, London, Pearson.
  8. INVALSI (2018), Rapporto prove INVALSI 2018, URL:
  9. Lang, C., Siemens, G. Wise, A., Gašević, A. (Eds), (2017), Handbook of learning analytics, Society for Learning Analytics Research, URL:
  10. Laurillard, D. (2012), Teaching as design science, London, Routledge.
  11. Papert, S. (1994), The children’s machine. Rethinking school in the age of the computer, London, Basic Books.
  12. Parshall C. G., Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., Davey, T. (2002), Practical considerations in computer-based testing, New York, NY, Springer
  13. Rasch G. (1980), Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.