Main Article Content


This work analyzes the teaching and educational approach, based on Distance Learning, used in a Mathematics class with Engineering students. Thinking critically about how we worked before the COVID-19 crisis, we try to elaborate on possible ways to overcome linear processes' inertia. The teacher's educational activities and the students’ reactions are analyzed in the light of the theory of Transformative Learning. We adopt the theoretical and analytical tools provided by the theory of Interest Dense Situation and the theory of Self-Determination. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was conducted referring to a didactic experiment monitoring various elements through a questionnaire consisting of open-ended and Likert questions and thought closed questions together with the results of the midterm test.


Distance Learning Transformative Learning Undergraduate Teaching Intense Dense Situation Mathematics Education STEAM Education Covid-19

Article Details

How to Cite
Branchetti, L., Capone, R., & Rossi, M. L. (2021). Distance – Learning Goes Viral: Redefining the Teaching Boundaries in the Transformative Pedagogy Perspective. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(2), 32-44.


  1. Alabdulaziz, M. S. (2021). COVID-19 and the use of digital technology in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25.
  2. Albano, G., & Ferrari, P. L. (2008). Integrating technology and research in mathematics education: the case of e-learning. In Advances in E-learning: Experiences and Methodologies (pp. 132-148). IGI Global.
  3. Albano, G. Mathematics and E-Learning: A conceptual framework. Fourth Congress of ERME, the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 17-21 February 2005, 2005, San Feliu de Guíxols, Spain. 10 p.
  4. Azhari, B., & Fajri, I. (2021). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: School closure in Indonesia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-21.
  5. Bakker, A., Wagner, D. Pandemic: lessons for today and tomorrow? Educ Stud Math (2020).
  6. Bakker, A., Cai, J., & Zenger, L. (2021). Future themes of mathematics education research: an international survey before and during the pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 1-24.
  7. Bardelle, C., Di Martino, P. (2012). E-learning in secondary–tertiary transition in mathematics: for what purpose? ZDM, 44(6), 787-800.
  8. Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48(5), 589-610.
  9. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2004). Interest-dense situations and their mathematical valences. In Tenth International Congress in Mathematics Education, Topic Study Group, Copenhagen. [Online: http://www. icme-organisers. dk/tsg24/Documents/BiknerAshbahs. doc].
  10. Branchetti, L., Capone, R., & Tortoriello, F. S. (2018). Un’esperienza didattica half-flipped in un ambiente di apprendimento SCALE-UP. Annali online della Didattica e della Formazione Docente, 9(14), 355-371.
  11. Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2016). Enhancing student engagement through the afordances of mobile technology: a 21st century learning perspective on Realistic Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 173–197.
  12. Brousseau, G. (1998).Théorie des situations didactiques. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage. Coll. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques.
  13. Capone, R., De Caterina, P., & Mazza, G. (2017). Blended learning flipped classroom and virtual environment: challenges and opportunities for the 21st century students. In Proceedings of EDULEARN17 Conference (pp. 10478-10482).
  14. Capone, R., Del Regno, F., & Tortoriello, F. (2018). E-Teaching in Mathematics Education: The Teacher’s Role in Online Discussion. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 14(3).
  15. Capone, R., & Lepore, M. (2020). Augmented Reality to Increase Interaction and Participation: A Case Study of Undergraduate Students in Mathematics Class. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics (pp. 185-204). Springer, Cham.
  16. Capone, R., & Lepore, M. (2021). From Distance Learning to Integrated Digital Learning: A Fuzzy Cognitive Analysis Focused on Engagement, Motivation, and Participation During COVID-19 Pandemic. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-31.
  17. Chan, M., Sabena, C. & Wagner, D. (2021). Mathematics education in a time of crisis—a viral pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, (in press).
  18. D’Aniello, G., De Falco, M., Gaeta, M., & Lepore, M. (2020a). A situation-aware learning system based on fuzzy cognitive maps to increase learner motivation and engagement. In: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) (pp. 1–8)
  19. Holmberg, Börje (2005). The evolution, principles and practices of distance education. Studien und Berichte der Arbeitsstelle Fernstudienforschung der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg [ASF] (in German). 11. Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Universitat Oldenburg. p. 13
  20. Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice. Sage.
  21. Likert R., (1932) “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes” Archives of Psychology, Vol. 140, No. 55.
  22. Mezirow, J. (1997). "Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice". New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.
  23. Morin, E., La tête bien faite. (2000). La testa ben fatta: riforma dell'insegnamento e riforma del pensiero. Milano: Cortina.
  24. Nichani M., Hung D., Can community of practice exist online?Educational Technology, pag. 49 - 54, 2001, vol. 42, n. 4.
  25. Popper, K. R. (1965). Of clouds and clocks: an approach to the problem of rationality and the freedom of man. Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honnor of Paul E. Meehl. Matters of public interest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, 100-139.
  26. Robutti, O. (2010). Community of learners with technologies. Investigação em Educação Matemática, 51.
  27. Ruiz, J. G., Candler, C., & Teasdale, T. A. (2007). Peer reviewing e-learning: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Academic Medicine, 82(5), 503-507.
  28. Siregar, G. M. A., & Siagian, M. D. (2021, May). Evaluation of online learning for mathematics education students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1882, No. 1, p. 012064). IOP Publishing.
  29. Taranto, E., Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2018). MOOC as a resource for teachers’ collaboration in educational program. In Proceedings of the re (s) sources 2018 international conference (pp. 167-170).
  30. Wenger E., Communities of practice: the social fabric of a learning organization, 1996.