Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 10, 2022
Accepted
Nov 14, 2022
Published
Dec 30, 2022
Download
PDF PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1705 Download : 892

Main Article Content

Abstract

The use of information and communication technologies for education is increasingly recognised as essential in a post-pandemic world. In this regard, the ability to effectively engage with technologies for educational purposes is now part of the basic knowledge, skills and attitudes to be expected from anyone in the teaching profession. Accentuated by the proliferation of technology-mediated situations resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic, but linked to a longer-term trend, dealing with the digital is also now an almost unavoidable aspect of active participation in society and civic engagement. Indeed, the notion of ‘postdigital’ is rapidly gaining traction as a way to highlight that the digital and non-digital cannot be really separated anymore and, due to this fact, (post)digital citizenship is emerging as a core competence for citizens. Still, the way digitally competent educators are expected to support learners in their development as digital citizens is not explored enough. To contribute to closing this gap, this paper reviews 24 teacher competence frameworks from different regions of the world and makes the case for considering educators’ critical digital literacy as a key leverage to building digital (post)citizenship and fostering ethical uses of technology. The analysis reveals that critical digital literacy is mostly missing and, hence, the paper closes with a set of recommendations for policymakers and institutional leaders in the education sector on how to incorporate critical aspects of digital literacy in educators’ professional development activities, so teachers and trainers can operate as a much needed vector to develop (post)digital citizenship across society.

Keywords

Teacher Competence Frameworks Digital Competence Teachers Critical Digital Literacies Digital Citizenship

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Villar-Onrubia, D., Morini, L., Marín, V. I., & Nascimbeni, F. (2022). Critical digital literacy as a key for (post)digital citizenship: an international review of teacher competence frameworks . Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(3), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135697

References

  1. Alexander, B., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., & Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). Digital Literacy in Higher Education, Part II: An NMC Horizon Project Strategic Brief. In New Media Consortium. New Media Consortium. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED593904
  2. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (Eds.). (1999). Situated Literacies: Theorising Reading and Writing in Context. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984963
  3. Bower, M. (2019). Technology-mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12771
  4. Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. (2017). Working Group on Education: Digital skills for life and work. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259013.locale=en
  5. Buckingham, D. (2018). Going Critical: On the Problems and the Necessity of Media Criticism. In H. Niesyto & H. Moser (Eds.), Medienkritik im digitalen Zeitalter. Co-Paed. https://ddbuckingham.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/going-critical.pdf
  6. Burnett, C. (2010). Technology and literacy in early childhood educational settings: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410372154
  7. Caena, F. (2014). Teacher Competence Frameworks in Europe: Policy-as-discourse and policy-as-practice. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12088
  8. Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
  9. Choi, M. (2016). A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
  10. Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190246693.001.0001
  11. Couros, A., & Hildebrandt, K. (2015). Digital Citizenship Education in Saskatchewan Schools. Government of Saskatchewan. https://pubsaskdev.blob.core.windows.net/pubsask-prod/83322/83322-DC_Guide_-_ENGLISH_2.pdf
  12. Cukier, K. & Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2014). The Rise of Big Data: How It’s Changing the Way We Think about the World. In M. Pitici (Ed.), The Best Writing on Mathematics 2014 (pp. 20-32). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400865307-003
  13. Davies, D. (1962). Professional Standards in Teaching: Moving from ldeas to Action. Journal of Teacher Education, 13(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248716201300223
  14. European Commission (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age. https://ec.europa.eu/education/education-in-the-eu/digital-education-action-plan_en
  15. European Union (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540
  16. Facer, K., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Digital Technology and the Futures of Education: Towards ‘Non-Stupid’ Optimism. Unesco. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377071
  17. Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., & Redecker, C. (2012). Understanding Digital Competence in the 21st Century: An Analysis of Current Frameworks. In A. Ravenscroft, S. Lindstaedt, C. D. Kloos, & D. Hernández-Leo (Eds.), 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills (pp. 79–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_7
  18. Gouseti, A., Bruni, I., Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Mundy, D., Raffaghelli, J. E., Ranieri, M., Roffi, A., Romero, M., & Romeu, T. (2021). Critical Digital Literacies framework for educators—DETECT project report 1. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5070329
  19. Government of Argentina (2018). Marco referencial de capacidades profesionales de la formación docente inicial. Ministerio de Educación de Argentina and Instituto Nacional de Formación Docente. https://cedoc.infd.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Marco-referencial-de-Capacidades-Profesionales-para-la-Formacion-Docente-Inicial.pdf
  20. Government of Hong Kong (2015). Professional Standards for Teachers and Principals of Hong Kong. Government of Hong Kong: Committee on Professional Development of Teachers and Principals. https://www.cotap.hk/index.php/en/t-standard/t-standard-pst
  21. Government of India (2009). National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education. National Council for Teacher Education. https://scert.assam.gov.in/sites/default/files/swf_utility_folder/departments/scert_medhassu_in_oid_6/portlet/level_2/1.%20NCFTE_2010.pdf
  22. Government of Myanmar (n.d.). Teacher Competency Standards Framework (TCSF). Ministry of Education. www.moe.gov.mm
  23. Government of South Africa (2011). National Qualifications Framework Act: Policy on minimum requirements for teacher education qualifications. Government Gazzette, 34467, 1–62. https://www.dhet.gov.za/Part%20C%20%20Policies/HIGHER%20EDUCATION/14.%20Policy%20on%20minimum%20requirements%20for%20teacher%20education%20qualifications.pdf
  24. INTEF (2017). Common Digital Competence Framework for Teachers. http://aprende.intef.es/sites/default/files/2018-05/2017_1024-Common-Digital-Competence-Framework-For-Teachers.pdf
  25. Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2015). Being digital citizens. Rowman & Littlefield International.
  26. Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000
  27. Landri, P. (2016). Standards and standardisation in European politics of education. A European Politics of Education. Perspectives from Sociology, Policy Studies and Politics (pp. 13–30). Routledge.
  28. Landri, P. (2022). Waves of Standardisation. In H. Riese, L. T. Hilt, & G. Elisabeth Søreide (Eds.), Educational Standardisation in a Complex World (pp. 25–42). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-589-920221002
  29. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  30. Leaning, M. (2019). An Approach to Digital Literacy through the Integration of Media and Information Literacy. Media and Communication, 7(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1931
  31. Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: A review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00474.x
  32. Livingstone, D. W. (2006). Informal learning: Conceptual distinctions and preliminary findings. Counterpoints, 249, 203–227. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42979596
  33. Loeckx, J. (2016). Blurring Boundaries in Education: Context and Impact of MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2395
  34. Marginson, S. (2019). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359823
  35. Marín, V. I., & Castañeda, L. (2022). Developing Digital Literacy for Teaching and Learning. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (Learners, Teachers, Media, and Technology). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_64-1
  36. Marín, V. I., Carpenter, J. P., & Tur, G. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of social media data privacy policies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13035
  37. Musset, P. (2010). Initial Teacher Education and Continuing Training Policies in a Comparative Perspective: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review on Potential Effects. OECD Education Working Papers (No. 48; OECD Education Working Papers). OECD Publishing. https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/48-en.html
  38. Nascimbeni, F. (2018). Rethinking Digital Literacy for Teachers in Open and Participatory Societies. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), 9(3), 1-11. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJDLDC.2018070101
  39. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2016). What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do. https://www.accomplishedteacher.org/_files/ugd/0ac8c7_25be1413beb24c14ab8f6e78a20aa98f.pdf
  40. NetSafe (2018). From literacy to fluency to citizenship: Digital citizenship in education. NetSafe. https://web.archive.org/web/20191205195638/https://www.netsafe.org.nz/the-kit/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/From-literacy-to-fluency-to-citizenship_July-2018.pdf
  41. Nguyen, D. (2021). Mediatisation and datafication in the global COVID-19 pandemic: On the urgency of data literacy. Media International Australia, 178(1), 210–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20947563
  42. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5
  43. Örtegren, A. (2022). Digital Citizenship and Professional Digital Competence—Swedish Subject Teacher Education in a Postdigital Era. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 467-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00291-7
  44. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishers.
  45. Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836
  46. Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2021). Digital Rights, Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy: What’s the Difference? Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.616
  47. Pujol Priego, L., & Kluzer, S. (2018). DigComp into action, get inspired make it happen a user guide to the European Digital Competence framework. (Stephanie Carretero, Y. Punie, R. Vuorikari, M. Cabrera, & W. O’Keeffe, Eds.). JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 29115 EN, Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC110624/dc_guide_may18.pdf
  48. QAA (2020). Building a Taxonomy for Digital Learning. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/guidance/building-a-taxonomy-for-digital-learning.pdf
  49. Quebec Ministry of Education (2019). Digital Competency Framework. http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/en/current-initiatives/digital-action-plan/digital-competency-framework/
  50. Quebec Ministry of Education (2021). Reference Framework for Professional Competencies for Teachers. https://cdn-contenu.quebec.ca/cdn-contenu/adm/min/education/publications-adm/devenir-enseignant/reference_framework_professional_competencies_teacher.pdf?1611584651
  51. Raffaghelli, J. E., & Stewart, B. (2020). Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’ to support future practices in faculty development: A systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1696301
  52. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
  53. Steyaert, J. (2002). Inequality and the digital divide: Myths and realities. In S. Hicks (Ed.), Advocacy, activism and the internet (pp. 199–211). Lyceum Press.
  54. Taffel, S. (2016). Perspectives on the postdigital: Beyond rhetorics of progress and novelty. Convergence, 22(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514567827
  55. Torrance, D., & Forde, C. (2017). Redefining what it means to be a teacher through professional standards: Implications for continuing teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1246527
  56. UNESCO (2011). Media and information literacy curriculum for teachers (A. Grizzle & C. Wilson, Eds.). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000192971
  57. UNESCO (2018). UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers: Version 3. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
  58. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Courtois, C., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). Internet Skills, Sources of Support, and Benefiting From Internet Use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30(4), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.858458
  59. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2, The Digital Competence framework for citizens: With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/115376