Article Sidebar

Submitted
Nov 24, 2022
Accepted
Sep 20, 2023
Published
Sep 28, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 234 Download : 149

Main Article Content

Abstract

The pandemic context has presented new challenges for education. In a short time, higher education institutions (HEIs) adapted their students, staff, technology, and infrastructures for a fast migration to distance learning. This change brought new challenges but also new opportunities that justify more contributions. The purpose of this paper is to study distance education (DE) methods and approaches, with a focus on management studies that are understudied. The research adopted a descriptive quantitative approach. Based on a sample of 400 documents using the Scopus database, a bibliometric analysis was carried out, aiming to identify the most prominent keywords, authors, sources, and countries for DE in general, with a focus on management courses in HEIs. The results suggest that innovation can be an asset for HEIs and can be seen as an ally for both teachers and students in learning new practices that involve digitalization. The bibliometric analysis highlights that motivation and collaboration are very important aspects and should be considered, especially when students are at the center of the teaching process. The main limitation regards the dominance of papers about DE, mostly based on the education sciences, and just a small number focusing on management courses. This limitation can influence the results achieved, but also allows this research to contribute for a better understanding of this field. This is one of few studies that has innovated by identifying the main subjects in DE literature, with a special emphasis on management courses, thus complementing previous scarce research in the field.

Keywords

Bibliometrics Distance Education Management Courses Higher Education Covid-19 Social Sciences e-Learning Innovation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
B. Moreira, S., Carolina Castro, & Luísa Carvalho. (2023). Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis for Distance Education with a focus on Management Studies. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 19(2), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135794

References

  1. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x
  2. Abudaqa, A., Hilmi, M. F., AlMujaini , H., Alzahmi, R. A., & Ahmed, G. (2021). Students’ perception of e-Learning during the Covid Pandemic: a fresh evidence from United Arab Emirates (UAE). Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(3), 110-118.
  3. Andrews, J. E. (2003). An author co-citation analysis of medical informatics. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91(1), 47–56.
  4. Anohina, A. (2005). Analysis of the terminology used in the field of virtual learning. Educational Technology and Society, 8(3), 91–102.
  5. Araújo, C. (2006). Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. https://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/article/view/16/5
  6. Arbaugh, J. B., Desai, A., Rau, B., & Sridhar, B. S. (2010). A review of research on online and blended learning in the management disciplines: 1994-2009. Organizational Management Journal, 7(1), 39–55. https://doi:10.1057/omj.2010.5
  7. Arbaugh, J. B., Godfrey, M. R., Johnson, M., Pollack, B. L., Niendorf, B., & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 12(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.006
  8. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  9. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
  10. Biju, S., More, B., Armathlingam, S., V P S Veluri , M., & Nurakmar Sh Ismail, S. (2022). Modelling academic delivery challenges during COVID-19: a binary logistic approach. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(1), 11-22.
  11. Bonk, C. J. (2020). Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors?, Distance Education, 41(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821610
  12. Castro, C., Moreira, S., & Carvalho, L. (2021). Perceção dos estudantes de gestão sobre o Ensino a Distância no Ensino Superior: Um estudo exploratório em contexto pandémico. paper presented at the 7.º Congresso Nacional de Práticas Pedagógicas no Ensino Superior, July, Aveiro, Portugal.
  13. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. (2014). Computers & Education Is FLIP enough ? Or should we usethe FLIPPED model instead ? Computers & Education, 79, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
  14. Costa, T., Lopes, S., Fernández-Limós, F., Amante, M. J., & Lopes, P. F. (2012). A Bibliometria e a Avaliação da Produção Científica: indicadores e ferramentas. paper presented at the 11º Congresso Nacional de Bibliotecários, Arquivistas e Documentalistas, 18 Oct, Lisbon, Portugal.
  15. Estelami, H., & Rezvani, Z. (2011). Structural and perceptual determinants of the price of online business education. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 20(2), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421111121152
  16. Evans, J., & Haase, I. (2001). Online business education in the twenty-first century: an analysis of potential target markets, Internet Research, 11(3), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240110396432
  17. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
  18. Garrison, D.R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice. 3rd ed., Routledge, London, LND.
  19. Holmberg, B. (1997). Distance-education theory again. Open Learning, 12(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051970120105
  20. Huang, C. K., & Lin, C. Y. (2017). Flipping business education: Transformative use of team-based learning in human resource management classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 323–336.
  21. Husin, N. A., Abdul Razak, N., Khairi, M. S. H., & Mohamad Nazeri, N. S. (2022). Full enforcement of e-Learning during first movement control operation of COVID-19 pandemic: are Malaysian university students ready?. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(1), 87-93.
  22. Idwan, S., Fayyoumi, E., Hijazi, H., & Matar, I. (2021). COVID-19 Pandemic Endorses New Era of e-learning. Case Study: Hashemite University. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(2), 56-65.
  23. Keegan, D. J. (1980). On defining distance education. Distance Education, 1(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791800010102
  24. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
  25. Li K. C., Wong, B. T. M., & Chan, H. T. (2023). Teaching and learning innovations for distance learning in the digital era: a literature review. Frontiers in Education, 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1198034
  26. Lopes, A. P., & Soares, F. (2018). Perception and performance in a flipped Financial Mathematics classroom. International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.001
  27. López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers and Education, 56(3), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
  28. Lotka, A.J. (1926).The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
  29. Machado Jr., C., de Souza, M. T. S., Parisotto, I. R. dos S., & Palmisano, A. (2016). The laws of bibliometrics in different scientific databases/As leis da bibliometria em diferentes bases de dados científicos. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 18(44), 111–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p111
  30. Moore, M. (1990). Recent contributions to the theory of distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 5(3), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051900050303
  31. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view. 2nd ed., Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont.
  32. Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664
  33. Noori, A. (2021). Educational managers and higher education leaders should adapt and change policies in emergency cases and consider all aspects of teaching and learning in higher education. Heliyon, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08113
  34. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
  35. Palvia, S., Aeron, P., Gupta, P., Mahapatra, D., Parida, R., Rosner, R., & Sindhi, S. (2018). Online Education: Worldwide Status, Challenges, Trends, and Implications. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(4), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262
  36. Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
  37. Rueda, L., Benitez, J., & Braojos, J. (2017). From traditional education technologies to student satisfaction in Management education: A theory of the role of social media applications. Information and Management, 54(8), 1059–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.06.002
  38. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2/3), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9045-8
  39. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  40. Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W. F. (2021). Facebook as an integrated online learning support application during the COVID19 pandemic: Thai university students’ experiences and perspectives. Heliyon, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08317
  41. Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605–632. https://doi:10.100711159-019-09792-3