Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 7, 2024
Accepted
Aug 20, 2024
Published
Aug 28, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 68 Download : 28

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study comprehensively compares and analyzes eight representative global frameworks for teacher Information and Communication Technology (ICT) competencies, each reflecting regional educational priorities and philosophies. The research aims to transcend geographical boundaries by identifying consensus on key areas of teacher ICT competencies and exploring unique characteristics of each framework within specific educational contexts and challenges. The findings indicate that despite diversity, global teacher ICT competencies represent an integration of knowledge, skills, and values, particularly in digital society building, digital career development, digital communication and collaboration, digital assessment, digital teaching and learning, and development of students’ digital competencies. The study further highlights varying emphasizes among frameworks in core areas and competencies, accompanied by varying levels of implementation support. Ultimately, the paper provides recommendations to assist educators, policymakers, and digital leaders in understanding global standards for teacher ICT competencies, developing effective and inclusive frameworks, and exploring best practices for advancing teacher ICT competencies.

Keywords

Teacher ICT Competencies Framework Comparative Analysis Information and Communication Technology

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Zou, X., Noh@Seth, N. H., & Pairan, M. R. (2024). Global perspectives on Teacher ICT Competencies: diversity and commonalities in eight representative frameworks. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 20(2), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135977

References

  1. China Education Newspaper. (2023, May 5). Experts interpret the education industry standard ‘Teacher Digital Literacy’. China Education and Research Network. https://www.edu.cn/xxh/focus/gd/202305/t20230508_2392632.shtml
  2. Dai, R., & Huangfu, L. (2021). The Evolution and the Characteristics of the Teachers’ ICT Competency Frameworks of the UNESCO and its Implications. Teacher Education Research, 33(5), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2021.05.014
  3. Department of Basic Education. (n.d.). Teacher Professional Development online platform for improved classroom practice and continued development and diagnostic self-assessments. Retrieved 24 June 2024, from https://www.education.gov.za/ArchivedDocuments/ArchivedArticles/Teacher-Professional-Development-online-platform-422.aspx
  4. Department of Basic Education. (2018, July 18). Professional Development Framework for Digital Learning training commences in full-force to enhance educator competencies to facilitate digital learning. https://www.education.gov.za/DigitalLearningFrameworkJuly18.aspx
  5. Education and Training Foundation. (n.d.). ETF’s Impact Report 2021-23. Retrieved 28 June 2024, from https://indd.adobe.com/view/0aaa699d-d2f3-45e0-a872-9b0084373757
  6. European Commission. (n.d.). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators. EU Science Hub. Retrieved 3 December 2023, from https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/digcompedu_en
  7. Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
  8. Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., & Redecker, C. (2012). Understanding digital competence in the 21st century: An analysis of current frameworks. In A. Ravenscroft, S. Lindstaedt, C. D. Kloos, & D. Hernández-Leo (Eds.), 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills (pp. 79–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_7
  9. Guangdong Education Department. (2020, April 26). Notice of the Guangdong Provincial Department of Education on the Collection and Selection of Training Course Resources for the Information Technology Application Ability Enhancement Project for Primary and Secondary School Teachers in Guangdong Province 2.0 Training Project. https://edu.gd.gov.cn/zwgknew/gsgg/content/post_3429283.html
  10. International Society for Technology in Education. (n.d.). Standards. Iste. Retrieved 25 June 2024, from https://iste.org/standards
  11. Joint Information Systems Committee. (n.d.). Case studies. Jisc. Retrieved 28 June 2024, from https://digitalcapability.jisc.ac.uk/case-studies/
  12. Lai, C., Lyu, B., & Gong, Y. (2023). Teacher digital literacy in pedagogical design. Foreign Language World, 3, 31–38.
  13. Lan, G., Zhang, Y., Wei, J., Guo, Q., Zhang, W., & Kong, X. (2021). Improving Teachers’ ICT Competency to Drive Teachers’ Professional Development: Key Points and Considerations of UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers （3rd Version）. Open Education Research, 27(2), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2021.02.001
  14. Liu, B., & Yi, X. (2023). Digital Literacy Framework for Higher Education Teachers:Global Landscape and Local Suggestions. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, 1, 79–88.
  15. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  16. Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2023). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: A review. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5
  17. Porta, D. della, & Keating, M. (2008). Comparative analysis: Case-oriented versus variable-oriented research. In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (pp. 198–222). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938
  18. Puentedura, R. R. (2003). A matrix model for designing and assessing network-enhanced courses. Retrieved March, 30, 2014.
  19. Shehata, B., Tlili, A., Huang, R., Adarkwah, M. A., Liu, M., & Chang, T. (2024). How are we doing with student-centered learning facilitated by educational technologies? A systematic review of literature reviews. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 7813–7854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12112-w
  20. Skakun, I. (2021). Digital Competencies of the Teacher of the Future. Futurity Education, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.18
  21. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
  22. UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers (3rd ed.). the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
  23. UNICEF ECARO. (2021). Implementation Plan 2020 – 2025 Version 1 (2021) Summary (1st ed.). UNICEF ECARO. https://www.unicef.org/eca/media/19861/file
  24. United Nations. (2022). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/
  25. Yan, G., & Liu, L. (2022). Research on Teachers’ Digital Literacy and Its Cultivation Path: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Seven Digital Literacy Frameworks for Teachers in the European Union. International and Comparative Education, 386(3), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.20013/j.cnki.ICE.2022.03.02
  26. Yuldasheva, L. R. (2021). Ict-competence as a professional characteristic of a modern teacher. International Journal of World Languages, 1(2), Article 2. https://ejournals.id/index.php/IJWL/article/view/202