Article Sidebar

Submitted
Sep 19, 2019
Accepted
May 11, 2020
Published
May 19, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 11604 Download : 6742

Main Article Content

Abstract

In the online learning environment, learners play an important role in attaining successful learning. Considering the students’ self-directed learning is important to university because of online learning is done in unlimited space and time. Through online mode, the learners do the social interaction. The interaction in online learning is categorized into four dimensions namely the interaction between the teachers and students, students and students, teachers and topic, and students and topic. This study emphasized the relationship between self-directed learning and students’ social interaction in the online learning environment. Statistical associations between variables were inspected with parametric correlation and statistically significant differences between independent samples were examined with a one-way analysis of variance. This study showed a significant relationship between students’ self-directed learning readiness (SDLR) and their social interaction, and there were different social interactions between students based on their SDLR levels.

Keywords

Online Learning Environment Self-directed Learning Social Interaction Instructional Technology

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Lasfeto, D. (2020). The relationship between self-directed learning and students’ social interaction in online learning environment. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(2), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135078

References

  1. Areglado, R. J., Bradley, R. C., & Lane, P. S. (1996), Learning for Life: Creating Classrooms for Self-Directed Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977), Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  3. Bernard, R. M., Rojo de Rubalcava, B., & St-Pierre, D. (2000), Collaborative online distance learning: Issues for future practice and research. Distance Education. 21(2), 260-277.
  4. Broadbent, J. (2016), Academic success is about self-efficacy rather than frequency of use of the learning management system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2016, 32(4).
  5. Cazan, A.M., & Schiopca, B. A. (2014), Self-directed learning, personality traits, and academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 640-644.
  6. Chapin, L. A. (2018), Australian university students’ access to web-based lecture recordings and the relationship with lecture attendance and academic performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2989
  7. Choy, J. L. F. & Quek, C. L. (2016), Modelling relationships between students’ academic achievement and community of inquiry in an online learning environment for a blended course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4).
  8. Clark, R.C., & Mayer, R.E. (2008), E-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  9. Cronbach, L.J. (1951), Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika,16(3), 297-334.
  10. Deperlioglu, O., Sonugur, G., & Suzme, K. (2015), Intelligent Questioning System Based on Fuzzy Logic. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Distance Education. USA: IGI Global.
  11. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1994), The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In H. Spada & P.Reimann (Eds.), Learning in Humans and Machines (pp. 189–211). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
  12. Finestone, P. (1984), A Construct Validation of the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale with Labour Education Participants [Doctoral Dissertation], Canada: University of Toronto.
  13. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003), E-Learning in the 21st Century: A framework for research and practice. (2nd ed.) London, UK: Routledge.
  14. Gibbons, M. (2002), The Self-Directed Learning Handbook. Jossey-Bass Wiley Imprint.
  15. Guglielmino, P. J., & Guglielmino, L. M. (2001), Learner characteristics affecting success in electronic distance learning. In H.B. Long & Associates, 21st century advances in self-directed learning. Schaumburg, IL: Motorola University Press.
  16. Guglielmino, P.J., & Guglielmino, L.M. (2002), Are your learners ready for e-learning? AMA handbook of online learning. New York: American Management Association.
  17. Guglielmino, L.M., & Guglielmino, P.J. (2003), Identifying Learners Who Are Ready for e-Learning and Supporting Their Success. Preparing learners for e-Learning, Published by Pfeiffer, 19-34.
  18. Guglielmino, L. (1989), Reactions to Field’s Investigation into the SDLRS: Guglielmino Responds to Field’s investigation. Adult Education Quarterly, 39, 235-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001848189039004005
  19. Guglielmino, L. M. (2008), Why Self-Directed Learning. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 5, 1-14.
  20. Harriman, J. K. (1990), The Relationship between Self-Directed Learning Readiness, Completion and Achievement in a Community College Telecourse Program. Doctoral Dissertation, Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
  21. Hadjileontiadou, S.J., Dias, S.B., Diniz, J.A., & Hadjileontiadis, L.J. (2105), Fuzzy Logic-Based Modeling in Collaborative and Blended Learning. IGI-Global, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8705-9
  22. Howell, D. (2002), Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
  23. Hsu, Y. C., & Shiue, Y. M. (2005), The Effect of Self-Directed Learning Readiness on Achievement Comparing Face-to-Face and Two-Way Distance Learning Instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32, 143-155.
  24. Hsu, Y., Gao, Y., Liu, T. C., & Sweller, J. (2015), Interactions Between Levels of Instructional Detail and Expertise When Learning with Computer Simulations. Educational Technology & Society, 18 (4), 113-127.
  25. Jeremić, Z., Jovanović, J., & Gašević, D. (2011), An environment for project-based collaborative learning of software design patterns. International Journal on Engineering Education, 27(1), 41-51.
  26. Knowles, M.S. (1975), Self-Directed Learning A Guide for Learners and Teacher. Cambridge Adult Education.
  27. Knowles, M. S. (1990), The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Co.
  28. Kovalenko, N.A., & Smirnova, A.Y. (2015), Self-directed learning through creative activity of students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 393-398.
  29. Kožuh, I., Jeremić, Z., Sarjaš, A., Lapuh Bele, J., Devedžić, V., & Debevc, M. (2015), Social Presence and Interaction in Learning Environments: The Effect on Student Success. Educational Technology & Society, 18 (1), 223-236.
  30. McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. W. (2010), Personalized and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2010, 26(1), 28-43.
  31. Milicevic, A.K., Vesin, B., Ivanovic, M., Budimac, Z., Jain, L.C. (2017), E-Learning Systems. Intelligent Systems Reference Library Vol.112, 3-17.
  32. Morris, S. S. (1995), The Relationship between Self-Directed Learning Readiness and Academic Performance in a Non-Traditional Higher Education Program. Doctoral Dissertation, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.
  33. Murnane, R. J., & Levy, F. (1996), Teaching the New Basic Skills: Principles for Educating Children to Thrive in a Changing Economy. New York: Free Press.
  34. Picciano, A.G. (2002), Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
  35. Posner, F. G. (1989), A Study of Self-Directed Learning, Perceived Competence, and Personal Orientation among Students in an Open Alternative High School. Doctoral Dissertation, Denver, CO: University of Denver.
  36. Saks, K., & Leijen, A. (2014), Distinguishing Self-Directed and Self-Regulated Learning and Measuring Them in the E-Learning Context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 112, 190-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1155.
  37. Shaikh, R. B. (2013), Comparison of Readiness for Self-Directed Learning in Students Experiencing Two Different Curricula in One Medical School. Gulf Medical Journal, 2, 27-31.
  38. Skaggs, B. J. (1981), The Relationships between Involvement of Professional Nurses in Self-Directed Learning Activities, Loci of Control, and Readiness for Self-Directed Learning Measures. Doctoral Dissertation, Austin, TX: University of Texas.
  39. Vuopala, E., Hyvönen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2016), Interaction forms in successful collaborative learning in virtual learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education. Vol. 17(1) 25– 38. DOI: 10.1177/1469787415616730
  40. Van Merrienboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F. (2003), Powerful learning and the many faces of instructional design: Towards a framework for the design of powerful learning environments. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J.J.G. Van Merrie¨nboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 3-20). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
  41. Wiley, K. (1981), Effects of a Self-Directed Learning Project and Preference for Structure on Self-Directed Learning Readiness of Baccalaureate Nursing Students. Doctoral Dissertation, DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.