Main Article Content
The contribution presents a reflection on the relationship between the use of assessment tools and the two-sided phenomenon of the completion rate and dropout rate in MOOCs. In support of this reflection, the experience of the MOOCs proposed by the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE) within the EduOpen network is described. In particular, the data relating to the quantity and quality of the assessment tools used in the MOOCs UNIMORE and the data on the completion rates of the 5 pathways currently active in the training offer on EduOpen and, specifically, of a MOOC with a complex evaluation system and particularly high completion rates are reported.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.
The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.
For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code
- Breslow, L. B., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment (8), 13–25
- Costello E., Holland J., Kirwan C, (2018), The future of online testing and assessment: question quality in MOOCs, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15:42
- Halawa, S.; Greene, D.; and Mitchell, J. (2014). Dropout prediction in moocs using learner activity features. Experiences and best practices in and around MOOCs. Proceedings of the European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit 2014, 58-65.
- Onah D.; Sinclair J.; Boyatt R.; Foss J. (2014), Massive Open Online Courses: Learners Partecipation, Proceeding of the 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (iCERI2014), Seville, Spain.
- Kizilcec, R. F.; Piech, C.; and Schneider, E. 2013. Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 170–179.
- Qi, Y.;Wu, Q.;Wang, H.; Tang, J.; and Sun, M. 2018. Bandit learning with implicit feedback. In NIPS 2018.
- Seaton, D. T.; Bergner, Y.; Chuang, I.; Mitros, P.; and Pritchard, D. E. 2014. Who does what in a massive open online course? Communications of the Acm 58–65.
- Zhenghao, C.; Alcorn, B.; Christensen, G.; Eriksson, N.; Koller, D.; and Emanuel, E. 2015. Whos benefiting from moocs, and why. Harvard Business Review 25.