Main Article Content


The current EduOpen dashboard is not capable of monitoring performances and trends over the medium to long term both for the students as for the instructors; summarising and synthesising the adequate information; allowing implementation of any sort of predictive actions and functions (learning prediction). The article aims to expose the process of innovation and redefinition of a learning analytics dashboard in the EduOpen MOOC platform in order to define a model to design it accurately in terms of productivity for all users (teachers and students above all).
From the literature analysis, main MOOC platform comparisons and the insights from the round tables a time spent variable is identified as at the basis of the entire user experience in online training paths. A concrete experimentation, through the design of a learning timeline and a constructive feedback system of an upcoming course in the EduOpen catalog, is designed and explained relaying on the hypothesis of the existence of a correlation between the “time spent” (time value) and the final performance of the student.


Time spent Learning Analytics Mooc dashboard Dashboard design

Article Details

How to Cite
Dipace, A., Fazlagic, B., & Minerva, T. (2019). The Design of a Learning Analytics Dashboard: EduOpen Mooc platform redefinition procedures. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 29-47.


  1. Arnold, K. E. (2010). Signals: Applying academic analytics. Educause Quarterly, 33(1), n1.
  2. Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 267-270). ACM.
  3. Author et al., 2019 in press
  4. Baker, B. (2007). A conceptual framework for making knowledge actionable through capital formation. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland University College, Maryland. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global. (Publication No. AAT 3254328).
  5. Brown, M., 2012. Learning Analytics: Moving from Concept to Practice. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative Brief, (July), pp.1–5.
  6. EdX (2017). EdX documentation: Building and Running an edX Course. Retrieved 27th of July from:
  7. Chatti, M.A. et al., 2012. A Reference Model for Learning Analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5), pp.318–331.
  8. Chitsaz, M., Vigentini, L. & Clayphan, A. (2016). Toward the development of a dynamic dashboard for FutureLearn MOOCs: insights and directions. In S. Barker, S. Dawson, A. Pardo, & C. Colvin (Eds.), Show Me The Learning. Proceedings ASCILITE 2016 Adelaide (pp. 116- 121).
  9. Cobos, R., Gil, S., Lareo, A., & Vargas, F. A. (2016). Open-DLAs: An Open Dashboard for Learning Analytics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
  10. Fredericks, C., Lopez, G., Shnayder, V., Rayyan, S., & Seaton, D. (2016). Instructor Dashboards In EdX. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
  11. Klerx, J., Verbert, K., & Duval, E. (2017). Learning analytics dashboards. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. F. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), The handbook of learning analytics (pp. 143–150). Alberta, Canada: Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR).
  12. Romero, M., & Barberà, E. (2015). Lifelong Learners and Teachers’ Time-Management Competency in E-Learning. International Handbook of E-Learning Volume 2: Implementation and Case Studies, 135.
  13. Sclater, N. (2017). Learning analytics explained. New York: Routledge.
  14. Siemens, G., & d Baker, R. S. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 252-254). ACM.
  15. de Waal, P. (2017). Learning Analytics: i sistemi dinamici di supporto alla decisione per il miglioramento continuo dei processi di insegnamento e apprendimento. Formazione & Insegnamento. Rivista internazionale di Scienze dell'educazione e della formazione, 15(2), 43-52.