Main Article Content

Abstract

 
This paper describes the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the MOOCs available in the EduOpen platform. In particular, data (analytics) concerning the variables “didactic disciplines” and “didactic structuring” are presented in order to identify the main trend lines and possible critical aspects. From the data analysis some useful elements emerge for a greater understanding of the main characteristics of the MOOCs offered by the EduOpen network, in particular: a) the quantitative dimensions of the supply and demand of the MOOCs; in this regard, a greater flow of enrolments towards the courses belonging to a scientific and technological nature is evident; b) the degree of didactic structuring of the courses; in this regard, the presence of assessment tools appears to be the element that more than others characterises the didactic structure of the MOOCs EduOpen. The conclusions suggest awareness-raising actions aimed at building dashboards that can report in real time to instructors and students critical and action needed issues and therefore provide a useful guidance both to prevent situations at risk and to support teachers in the design and development of new courses.

Keywords

MOOCs Evaluation Assessment Didactic Instructional Design

Article Details

How to Cite
Fazlagic, B., & Cecconi, L. (2019). Disciplinary and didactic profiles in the EduOpen network MOOCs. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135064

References

  1. Conole G. (2013), MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of Moocs, RED - Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39.
  2. De Santis A., Fazlagic B., Sannicandro K., Folloni V., Tedeschi C., Minerva T. (2017), From design guidelines to validation checklists: EduOpen MOOCs, Design the Future! Multiconferenza EM&M ITALIA 2016, Modena, pp. 264-275.
  3. Limone P., Pace R., De Santis A. (2016), Guidelines for the design of MOOC courses: the experience of the University of Foggia, in M. Rui, L. Messina, & T. Minerva (eds), Teach different! Proceedings of the EMEMITALIA2015 Multiconference. 495-498. Genova, Genova University Press.
  4. Swan K., Day S., Bogle L., Van Prooyen T., (2014), AMP: a tool for characterizing the pedagogical approaches of MOOCs, e-mentor, 2(54), 75-85.