Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 2, 2024
Published
Nov 4, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 31 Download : 17

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper introduces an integrated educational model for higher education, ECOBI, which combines Educational Clusters (teaching programs), the Blended Intensive approach, and the issuance of Open Badges within university curricula. Adopted by EDUNEXT, a network of 35 Italian universities aimed at digital educational innovation and university network development, ECOBI proposes a competency-based design that makes degree courses and Educational Clusters planned to develop specific skills relevant to the 21st-century landscape. The Intensive Blended approach integrates online teaching activities with intensive in-person training weeks, combining the strengths of both experiences. This model offers modularity and flexibility, promotes interdisciplinary learning and interchangeability of content, and meets the needs of current higher education. The article describes the ECOBI approach, its characteristics, strengths and advantages, and highlights its implementation within the EDUNEXT network.

Keywords

Digital Education University Blended Learning, Open Badges Competencies Interuniversities Collaboration Higher Education

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Minerva, T., De Santis, A., Sannicandro, K., & Bellini, C. (2024). Integration of Educational Clusters with Open Badges and Blended Intensive Program (ECOBI): a comprehensive approach to future university education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 20(3), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1136068

References

  1. Abdekhoda, M., & Dehnad, A. (2023). Effective organizational factors in adopting e-Learning in education: extracting determinants and frameworks. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 19(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135669
  2. Ait Baha, T., El Hajji, M., Es-Saady, Y., & Fadili, H. (2024). The impact of educational chatbot on student learning experience. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 10153-10176.
  3. Akçapınar, G., Altun, A., & Aşkar, P. (2019). Using learning analytics to develop early-warning system for at-risk students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 40.
  4. Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421-439.
  5. Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT Initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436-449.
  6. Bates, A. W. (2022). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning (3a ed.). Vancouver, BC: Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieve from: https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev3m/
  7. Bellini, C., De Santis, A., Sannicandro, K., & Minerva, T. (2019). Data management in Learning Analytics: terms and perspectives. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135021
  8. Beke, E., Horvath, R., & Takacsne, G.K. (2020). Industry 4.0 and Current Competencies. Naše gospo- darstvo/Our Economy, 66(4), 63-70.
  9. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  10. Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 8(2-3), 73-272.
  11. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2012). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  12. Borup, J., Graham, C. R., Short, C., & Shin, J. K. (2022). Designing the new normal: Enable, engage, elevate, and extend student learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2022/1/designing-the-new-normal-enable-engage-elevate-and-extend-student-learning
  13. Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G.E., Lee, M.J.W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1-17.
  14. Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6.
  15. Carey, K., & Stefaniak, J. (2018). An exploration of the utility of digital badging in higher education settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1211-1229.
  16. Cedefop (2023). Microcredentials for labour market education and training: microcredentials and evolving qualifications systems. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
  17. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278.
  18. Chen, P.S.D., Lambert, A.D., & Guidry, K.R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.
  19. Clements, K., West, R. E., & Hunsaker, E. (2020). Getting started with open badges and open microcredentials. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 154-172.
  20. De Santis, A., Bellini, C., Jana, M., Righetti, L., Sannicandro, K., Talha, M., & Minerva, T. (2024). Dashboards for admins, teachers, and students: tools for monitoring and learning. EDULEARN24 Proceedings (pp. 4666-4672). IATED.
  21. De Santis, A., Sannicandro, K., Bellini, C., & Minerva, T. (2023). Analysis of MOOC Features in a Regional Platform: Design and Delivery of Courses. In International Workshop on Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online (pp. 30-43). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  22. Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics: It’s a DELICATE issue-a checklist for trusted learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 89-98).
  23. Ehlers, U.-D., & Kellermann, S. A. (2019). Future Skills-The Future of Learning and Higher Education. Results of the International Future Skills Delphi Survey. Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences.
  24. Ferguson, R., Hoel, T., Scheffel, M., & Drachsler, H. (2016). Guest editorial: Ethics and privacy in learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 5-15.
  25. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
  26. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  27. Gish-Lieberman, J. J., Tawfik, A., & Gatewood, J. (2021). Micro-credentials and badges in education: A historical overview. TechTrends, 65, 5-7.
  28. Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In Handbook of Distance Education (3rd ed., pp. 333-350). New York, NY: Routledge.
  29. Graham, C. R., & Draper, D. E. (n.d.). Blended Teaching. The Open Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ encyclopedia/blended_teaching
  30. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 41-50).
  31. Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L.S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International journal of educational research, 102, 101586.
  32. Halupa, C. (2019). Differentiation of Roles: Instructional Designers and Faculty in the Creation of Online Courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 8 (1), 55-68.
  33. Han, X., Cui, Y., Wang, W., Wang, S., & Feng, X. (2023). Implementation of Blended Learning at the Course Level. In Handbook of Educational Reform Through Blended Learning (pp. 45-123). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  34. Helleken, T., Langesee, L.M., & Jantos, A. (2024). Bridging the gap: a guide for competence improvement methods for e-tutors in higher education. In EDULEARN24 Proceedings (pp. 304-313). IATED.
  35. Henrie, C.R., Halverson, L.R., & Graham, C.R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53.
  36. HolonIQ (2023). Micro-credentials Survey. 2023 Trends and Insights. Retrieved from https://www.holoniq.com/notes/micro-credentials-survey-2023-insights
  37. Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564-569.
  38. Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961-1990.
  39. Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Klisarova-Belcheva, S., Dimitrov, A., Bratkov, M., & Angelov, D. (2023). Effects of generative chatbots in higher education. Information, 14(9), 492.
  40. Iniesto, F., Ferguson, R., Weller, M., Farrow, R., & Pitt, R. (2022). Introducing a reflective framework for the assessment and recognition of microcredentials. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 2(2), 1-2 4.
  41. Jensen, L., Konradsen, F., & Nielsen, C. (2019). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 151-158.
  42. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 85-118.
  43. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.
  44. Knight, S., Shum, S. B., & Littleton, K. (2014). Epistemology, assessment, pedagogy: Where learning meets analytics in the middle space. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 23-47.
  45. Kossen, C., & Ooi, C.Y. (2021). Trialling micro-learning design to increase engagement in online courses. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(3), 299-310.
  46. Koszalka, T.A., RussEft, D.F., & Reiser, R. (2013). Instructional designer competencies: The standards. IAP.
  47. Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 56.
  48. Laferrière, T., Lamon, M., & Chan, C. K. K. (2006). Emerging e-trends and models in teacher education and professional development. Teaching Education, 17(1), 75-90.
  49. Lang, C., Siemens, G., Wise, A.F., Gašević, D., & Merceron, A. (2022) (Eds.). Handbook of Learning Analytics (2nd. ed.). Vancouver: SoLAR.
  50. Langesee, L.M. (2023). From qualification to competencies: defining a task-based competency profile for e-tutors in higher education. International Journal of Management in Education, 17(2), 109-129.
  51. Li, S., Zhang, J., Yu, C., & Chen, L. (2017). Rethinking distance tutoring in e-learning environments: A study of the priority of roles and competencies of Open University Tutors in China. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 189-212.
  52. Liasidou, A. (2014). Critical disability studies and socially just change in higher education. British Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 120-135.
  53. Liu, Q., Chen, L., Feng, X., Bai, X., & Ma, Z. (2024). Supporting students and instructors in blended learning. Handbook of Educational Reform Through Blended Learning, 199-230.
  54. López-Gómez, E., Leví-Orta, G., Medina Rivilla, A., & Ramos-Méndez, E. (2020). Dimensions of university tutoring: a psychometric study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(5), 609-627.
  55. MacDonald, J. (2008). Blended learning and online tutoring: Planning learner support and activity design. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
  56. Magruder, O., Arnold, D. A., Moore, S., & Edwards, M. (2019). What Is an ID? A Survey Study. Online Learning, 23(3), 137-160.
  57. Masiello, I., Mohseni, Z., Palma, F., Nordmark, S., Augustsson, H., & Rundquist, R. (2024). A Current Overview of the Use of Learning Analytics Dashboards. Education Sciences, 14(1), 82.
  58. Massuga, F., Soares, S., & Luis Dias Doliveria, S. (2021). El papel del tutor en la enseñanza de la educación a distancia: una revisión sistemática sobre el enfoque de competencias. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 21(66).
  59. McGill, T. J., Klobas, J. E., & Renzi, S. (2014). Critical success factors for the continuation of e-learning initiatives. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 24-36.
  60. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Bakia, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.
  61. Minerva, T., Jana, M., Bellini, C., De Santis, A., & Sannicandro, K. (2022). Openess in education: A technological and conceptual framework. In EDULEARN22 Proceedings (pp. 4521-4526). IATED.
  62. Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 22.
  63. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.
  64. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391.
  65. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.
  66. Ramaswami, G., Susnjak, T., & Mathrani, A. (2023). Effectiveness of a Learning Analytics Dashboard for Increasing Student Engagement Levels. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10 (3), 115-134.
  67. Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (Eds.). (2017). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  68. Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  69. Sannicandro, K., De Santis, A., Bellini, C., & Minerva, T. (2019). Analysis of completion and dropout rates in EduOpen MOOCs. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 27-42.
  70. Schwendimann, B.A., Rodriguez-Triana, M.J., Vozniuk, A., Prieto, L.P., Boroujeni, M.S., Holzer, A., Gillet, D., & Dillenbourg, P. (2017). Perceiving Learning at a Glance: A Systematic Literature Review of Learning Dashboard Research. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), 30-41.
  71. Selwyn, N. (2014). Digital Technology and the Contemporary University: Degrees of Digitization. New York, NY: Routledge.
  72. Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510-1529.
  73. Staring, F., Brown, M., Bacsich, P., & Ifenthaler, D. (2022). Digital higher education: Emerging quality standards, practices and supports. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 281, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  74. Stephany, F., & Teutloff, O. (2024). What is the price of a skill? The value of complementarity. Research Policy, 53(1), 104898.
  75. Stensaker, B. (2018). Academic development as cultural work: Responding to the organizational complexity of modern higher education institutions. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 274-285.
  76. Suhasini, B., & Santhosh Kumar, N. (2019). Emerging trends and future perspective of human resource reskilling in higher education. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 351-353.
  77. Tomlinson, M. (2017). Forms of graduate capital and their relationship to graduate employability. Education + Training, 59(4), 338-352.
  78. Vegliante, R., & Sannicandro, K. (2020). The role of the tutor in the university context and in distance learning: an exploratory research. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(3), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135274
  79. Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., & Santos, J.L. (2013). Learning analytics dashboard applications. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1500-1509.
  80. Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 1-33.
  81. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  82. Willis, J. E., Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2016). Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: A typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 881-901.
  83. Yorke, M. (2006). Employability in higher education: What it is-What it is not. Learning and Employability Series One. York: Higher Education Academy.
  84. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.

Most read articles by the same author(s)