Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 21, 2022
Accepted
Aug 30, 2022
Published
Aug 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 406 Download : 287

Main Article Content

Abstract

Audiovisual cognitive artifacts in all their forms are increasingly used in flipped, blended, MOOCs and conventional teaching and learning processes. During the health emergency due to the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, they were in many cases, in schools and universities, the only response to the need to follow up on training processes, which were compulsorily remote, becoming the educational media par excellence. This work concerns the use of educational technologies, specifically two audiovisual didactic texts, carried out in compliance with international multimedia design standards, to support conventional face-to-face didactic activities, in the field of professional health training (Lab for the simulation of radio-pharmacy activities, University of Ferrara, Italy). It is functional research to verify, on the one hand, the reinforcement of declarative knowledge (through a questionnaire administered in person immediately after the videos had been viewed) and on the other hand the perception of the effectiveness of the educational resources used (through a questionnaire administered online one week after the video had been viewed) for the reinforcement of procedural knowledge. All the instruments were administered to the entire group of 21 students attending the degree course for medical radiographers divided into two groups. The final objective is twofold: to contribute to the research area of video-based learning aimed at experimentally verifying the design principles underlying multimedia learning; to verify the application of this methodology within laboratory teaching of medical degree courses and the health professions in order to meet educational needs in terms of improving the learning processes of complex manual procedures.

Keywords

Instructional Video Video and Medicine Subjective Shot Multimedia Learning

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Ganino, G. (2022). Technologies for improving laboratory learning in healthcare professions: the case of instructional video. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135705

References

  1. Arguel, A., & Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 2, pp. 354-359.
  2. Boucheix, J.M., Gauthier, P., Fontaine, J., & Jaffeux, S. (2018). Mixed camera viewpoints improve learning medical hand procedure from video in nurse training? Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 418-429. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.017
  3. Brame, C.J. (2016). Effective educational videos: principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15, 4. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
  4. Bugaiska, A., Ferreri, L., Bouquet, C.A., Kalenzaga, S., & Clarys, D. (2015). Self as a moderator of age-related deficit on Recollection. Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 115, 77-88. doi:10.4074/S0003503314000013
  5. Carmichael, M., Reid, A.K., & Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Educational Video on Student Engagement, Critical Thinking and Learning: The Current State of Play (White Paper). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing, Inc.
  6. Castro-Alonso, J.C., Ayres, P., Wong, M., & Paas, F. (2018). Learning symbols from permanent and transient visual presentations: Don't overplay the hand. Computers & Education, 116, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.011
  7. Clark, R., & Lyons, C. (2010). Graphics for Learning: Proven Guidelines for Planning, Designing, and Evaluating Visuals in Training Materials. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  8. Clark, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Cooper, D., & Higgins, S. (2014). The effectiveness of online instructional videos in the acquisition and demonstration of cognitive, affective and psychomotor rehabilitation skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 46, n. 4-2015, 768–779. doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12166
  10. De Koning, B.B., & Tabbers, H.K. (2011). Facilitating understanding of movements in dynamic visualizations: An embodied perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 23, pp. 501–521.
  11. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9173-8
  12. Doolittle, P.E., Bryant, L.H., & Chittum, J.R. (2015). Effects of degree of segmentation and learner disposition on multimedia learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1333–1343.
  13. Fukuta, J. & Morgan, J. (2018). First-person perspective video to enhance simulation. Clin Teach, 15, 231–235. doi:10.1111/tct.12659
  14. Garland, T.B., & Sanchez, C.A. (2013). Rotational perspective and learning procedural tasks from dynamic media. Computers and Education, 69, 31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.014
  15. Giannakos, M.N., Jaccheri, L., & Krogstie, J. (2016). Exploring the relationship between video lecture usage patterns and students attitudes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1259–1275.
  16. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, ACM, 41-50. doi:10.1145/2556325.2566239
  17. Jannin, L., Ganier, F., & DeVries, P. (2017). Effet du point de vue de présentation des instructions et de l’aptitude à la rotation mentale sur l’apprentissage d’un geste technique. Conférence EPIQUE, Dijon, France.
  18. Ibrahim, M, Antonenko, P.D, Greenwood CM, &Wheeler, D (2012). Effects of segmenting, signaling, and weeding on learning from educational video. Learn Media Technology, 37, 220-235. doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.585993
  19. Laurillard, D. (2012). Insegnamento come scienze della progettazione. Costruire modelli pedagogici per apprendere con le tecnologie. Tr. it. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2015.
  20. Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Mayer, R.E. (2014). Multimedia instruction. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 385-399. New York: Springer.
  22. Mitra, B., Lewin-Jones, J., Barrett, H., & Williamson, S. (2010), The use of video to enable deep learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(4), 405–414.
  23. Pelligrino, G.D., Fadiga, Fogassi, Gallese, L.V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91 (1), 176-180.
  24. Pi, Z., & Hong, J. (2016). Learning process and learning outcomes of video podcasts including the instructor and ppt slides: a Chinese case. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(2), 135–144.
  25. Ramlogan, S., Raman, V., & Sweet, J. (2014). A comparison of two forms of teaching instruction: video vs. live lecture for education in clinical periodontology. European Journal of Dental Education, 18(1), 31–38.
  26. Rasi, P., & Poikela, S. (2016). A review of video triggers and video production in higher education and continuing education pbl settings. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1).
  27. Risko, E.F, Anderson. N, Sarwal, A, Engelhardt, M., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Everyday attention: variation in mind wandering and memory in a lecture. Appl Cognitive Psych, 26, 234-242.
  28. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27 (2004), pp. 169-192.
  29. Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2006). So quel che fai. Il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  30. Rivoltella, P.C. (2021). Il design: architettura, carico cognitivo, layout. In Rivoltella, P.C. (a cura di) (2021). Apprendere a distanza. Teorie e metodi. Milano: Cortina.
  31. Robbins, P., & Aydele, M. (2009). A short primer on situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.C., & Paas, F.G. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review 10, 251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
  33. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.C., & Paas, F.G. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
  34. Thomson, F.C, Morrison, I., Watson, W.A. (2017). Going Professional: using point-of-view filming to facilitate preparation for practice in final year medical students. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn, 4, 147-149. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000224
  35. Wang, J., & Antonenko, P. (2017). Instructor presence in instructional video: Effects on visual attention, recall, and perceived learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.049