Article Sidebar

Submitted
Feb 15, 2021
Accepted
Jul 13, 2021
Published
Jul 26, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1849 Download : 1077

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has forced the education system to a rapid and unprepared transition to distance learning, inducing many teachers to organize lessons via information and communication technologies (ICTs), albeit often without sufficient technological and organizational support. Our study aims to evaluate teachers’ and students’ experience with ICTs during the first lockdown, considering three categories of relevant factors: technical issues, attitudes and beliefs towards online learning, and metacognitive skills. Participants were 486 students and 83 teachers of a Northern Italy high school, who were administered a self-reported online questionnaire. Video-lessons and audio-lessons emerged as overlooked teaching modalities. The desktop was the less used device, teachers preferred the tablet, while students preferred the smartphone. In general, students displayed appreciation of distance learning, even if they wished for more interactive activities. Teachers’ level of metacognitive competence and self-efficacy were rather high. For students, the perception of the e-learning environment predicted positively the perception of distance education and negatively the experienced anxiety, with anxiety also being higher among females. For teachers, the evaluation of distance learning was positively predicted by their beliefs about ICTs. This demonstrates the importance of promoting positive ICTs beliefs to motivate teachers in engaging in distance learning. Moreover, higher perceived self-efficacy was associated with lower levels of anxiety, thus showing the need to engage in training activities enabling teachers to feel confident when using ICTs.

Keywords

Distance Learning e-Learning Smart teaching ICT Covid-19

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author declares that the submitted to Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (Je-LKS) is original and that is has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The author agrees that SIe-L (Italian Society of e-Learning) has the right to publish the material sent for inclusion in the journal Je-LKS.
The author agree that articles may be published in digital format (on the Internet or on any digital support and media) and in printed format, including future re-editions, in any language and in any license including proprietary licenses, creative commons license or open access license. SIe-L may also use parts of the work to advertise and promote the publication.
The author declares s/he has all the necessary rights to authorize the editor and SIe-L to publish the work.
The author assures that the publication of the work in no way infringes the rights of third parties, nor violates any penal norms and absolves SIe-L from all damages and costs which may result from publication.

The author declares further s/he has received written permission without limits of time, territory, or language from the rights holders for the free use of all images and parts of works still covered by copyright, without any cost or expenses to SIe-L.

For all the information please check the Ethical Code of Je-LKS, available at http://www.je-lks.org/index.php/ethical-code

How to Cite
Cadamuro, A., Bisagno, E., Rubichi, S., Rossi, L., Cottafavi, D., Crapolicchio, E., & Vezzali, L. (2021). Distance learning and teaching as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic: A survey of teachers and students of an Italian high school taking into account technological issues, attitudes and beliefs toward distance learning, metacognitive skills. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(1), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135463

References

  1. Abedalaziz, N., Jamaluddin, S., & Leng, C.H. (2013). Measuring Attitudes towards Computer and Internet Usage among Postgraduates Students in Malaysia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12.
  2. Adenuga, R. A., Owoyele, J., W., Adenuga, F. T. (2011). Gender and socio-economic background differentials in students’ attitude to information and communication technology education in Nigerian secondary schools: Implications for policy, ICT education and counselling. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 3, 162-166. DOI: 10.5897/IJPC10.029
  3. Amiri, R., & Sharifi, M. (2014). The Influence of Using Interactive Whiteboard on Writings of EFL Students Regarding Adverbs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 242-250. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.413
  4. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report. A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. European Schoolnet.
  5. Battro, A. M. (2010). The Teaching Brain. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4, 28-33. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228x.2009.01080.x
  6. Becta (2004) A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Coventry: Becta. www.becta.org.uk/page documents/research/barriers.pdf.
  7. Chen, H. R., Chiang, C. H., & Lin, W. S. (2013). Learning Effects of Interactive Whiteboard Pedagogy for Students in Taiwan from the Perspective of Multiple Intelligences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49, 173-187. doi:10.2190/ec.49.2.c
  8. Cox M. (2003) The Effects of Attitudes, Pedagogical Practices and Teachers’ Roles on the Incorporation of ICT into the School Curriculum. In: Dowling C., Lai KW. (eds) Information and Communication Technology and the Teacher of the Future. IFIP - The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 132. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35701-0_16
  9. Davis, N.; Eickelmann, B.; Zaka, P. (2013). Restructuring of educational systems in the digital age from a co-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 438-450. doi:10.1111/jcal.12032
  10. Drossel, K., Eickelmann, B., Gerick, J. (2017). Predictors of teachers’ use of ICT in school - the relevance of school characteristics, teachers’ attitudes and teacher collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 551–573. doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9476-y
  11. Edmunds, R., Mary Thorpe, M., Conole, G. (2012). Student attitudes towards and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 71-84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01142.x
  12. Eickelmann, B., Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers‘ attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 1-29. doi:10.1177/1474904117725899
  13. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for Life in a Digital Age – The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study. International Report. Amsterdam: IEA.
  14. Fu, J., S. (2013). ICT in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9, 112-125.
  15. Gewin V (2020) Five tips for moving teaching online as COVID19 takes hold. Nature, 580:295-296.
  16. Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 213-225. doi:10.1080/17439880701511040
  17. Holme, T. (2020). A. Journal of Chemical Education Call for Papers: Special Issue on Insights Gained While Teaching Chemistry in the Time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 97, 1226-1227. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00378
  18. Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Marra, R., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  19. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). New York, NY: Routledge.
  20. Kubiatko, M. (2010). Czech university students attitudes towards ICT used in science education. Journal of Technology and Information Education, 2, 20-25.
  21. Liaw, S., S. (2002). Understanding user perceptions of World-wide web environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 137-148. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00221.x
  22. Ligorio, M.B., Loperfido, F.F., Sansone, N., & Spadaro, P.F. (2010). Blending educational models to design blended activities. In F. Pozzi & D. Persico, (Eds.): Techniques for Fostering Collaboration in Online Learning Communities: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives (pp. 64-81). Information Science Publishing.
  23. Monteith, M. (ed.) (2002). ICT: Teaching primary literacy with ICT. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  24. Perkmen, S. (2014). The role of personality and school climate on pre-service teachers’ motivation towards technology integration in education. Education Sciences, 9, 380-393. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/nwsaedu/issue/19838/212542
  25. Phan, T. T. N., & Dang, L. T. T. (2017). Teacher Readiness for Online Teaching: A Critical Review. International Journal Open Distance E-Learn, 3, 1-16.
  26. Phelps, R., Graham, A. (2008). Developing Technology Together, Together, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24, 125-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2008.10784598
  27. Schleicher, A., & Reimers, F. (2020). Schooling Disrupted, Schooling Rethought: How the COVID-19 Pandemic is Changing Education. OECD. URL: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=133_133390-1rtuknc0hi &title= -Schooling-disrupted-schooling-rethought-How-the-Covid-19-pandemic-is-changing-education.
  28. Phelps, R., Graham, A., & Kerr, B. (2004). Teachers and ICT: Exploring a metacognitive approach to professional development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1367
  29. Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: a self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1585-1604.
  30. Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54, 103-112. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
  31. Scanlon J. (2020). What it means to teach consumer culture remotely through a pandemic. Advertising & Society Quarterly, 21.
  32. Shapka, J. D., & Ferrari, M. (2003). Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 319–334.
  33. Silin, Y., & Kwok, D. (2017). A study of students’ attitudes towards using ICT in a social constructivist environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2890
  34. Sindiani AM, Obeidat N, Alshdaifat E, Elsalem L, Alwani MM, Rawashdeh H, Fares AS, Alalawne T, Tawalbeh LI. (2020). Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 59, 186-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.036.
  35. Somyurek, S., Atasoy, B., & Ozdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart? Computers & Education, 53, 368-374. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.012
  36. Sun, H., Zhang, P. (2008). An exploration of affect factors and their role in user technology acceptance: Mediation and causality. Journal of The American Society For Information Science And Technology, 59, 1252–1263. doi:10.1002/asi.20819
  37. Teo, T., Lee, C.B., Chai, C.S., Choy, D. (2009). Modelling pre-service teachers’ perceived usefulness of an ICT-based student-centred learning (SCL) curriculum: a Singapore study. Asia Pacific Educational. Review, 10, 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9051-y
  38. Toprakçi, E. (2006). Perceptions related to ICT by managers and teachers in the primary and the secondary schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 24, 180-187.
  39. UNESCO (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
  40. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46,186-204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  41. Volery, T., Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14, 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010344731
  42. Watson, D.M. (Ed.) (1993) IMPACT - An evaluation of the IMPACT of the Information Technology on Children's Achievements in Primary and Secondary Schools. King's College London.